"Andrey Vul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do you believe that you need HFS+ at all?
> Because I have paths which exceed the HFS limit and lead to
> truncation, in addition to symlinks. Both work incorrectly.
> E.g.,
> HFS+ directory name: Garritan Instruments for Finale 2009
> HFS directory name: Garritan Instruments for Finale
No problem for UDF!
> I want my remastered (backup) to look exactly like the original:
> Joliet(or ISO9660:1999) for Windows and HFS+ for OS X.
> >
> > mkisofs supports Apple MAC UDF extensions since Spring 2007.
> UDF != HFS+
Correct, but I still see no reason why HFS+ is required.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
