At Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:00:39 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> Allan Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Joerg believes that cdrkit is not as good as cdrtools (I have used only >> cdrtools and it works well for me). > > "Believes" is less that "knows". I was/am trying to sound neutral and not spark a long debate. > I know that if you take a very old source and add new bugs that the > result cannot be better than the maintained original. > > In contrary to the people behing cdrkit, No comment. > I carefully listen to the problems uf the users and I add bug-fixes > for cdrtools or workarounds for defective drive firmware or > conceptional bugs in e.g. the Linux kernel. I very much agree and appreciate your helpful comments on this mailing list with regard to technical questions involving use of cdrtools > As a result, there are much less problems with the original software > than with the fork. I have not used the fork, but will say that cdrtools works well for me, thanks in part to your helpful technical comments on this list. thank you for cdrtools, allan
