Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2010 schrieb Iain Buchanan: > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 03:32 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > a while ago, I emerged virtual/jdk, and prior to it sun-jdk > > in order to direct manually what the virtual shall pull in. > > > > But now, virtual/jdk wants to install dev-java/icedtea as well. > > [...] > > Even though I understand from the virtual’s ebuild > > that it needs one and only one of those. > > [...] > > Am I getting something wrong here? Why is it pulling in icedtea? > > I’m on x86 BTW.
> [...] > However I remember that sun-jdk requires a license acceptance which has > changed recently, so maybe sun-jdk is now masked on your system, hence > the need for something else. > > What is the complete emerge output? Look for any masked or license > restricted packages. I added this to /etc/portage/package.license: > dev-java/sun-jdk dlj-1.1 Indeed there's an output concerning a lincence. I ignored it because in the past I had loads of messages there about masked or missing ebuilds due to the phasing-out of KDE3, which I still run. In that case though I would have expected portage wanting to remove sun-jdk because of a licence issue. Oh well, guess that's solved then. :-) -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' Killing for peace is like fucking for virginity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
