On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 03:12 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2010 schrieb Iain Buchanan:

> > What is the complete emerge output?  Look for any masked or license
> > restricted packages.  I added this to /etc/portage/package.license:
> > dev-java/sun-jdk dlj-1.1
> 
> Indeed there's an output concerning a lincence. I ignored it because in the 
> past I had loads of messages there about masked or missing ebuilds due to the 
> phasing-out of KDE3, which I still run. In that case though I would have 
> expected portage wanting to remove sun-jdk because of a licence issue.

unless you have sun-jdk in your world file, which would happen if you
ever specifically emerged it.  In that case sun-jdk would not be
un-merged because you asked for it, and icedtea would be pulled in being
the only non-masked dependency of the virtual...  I think!

>  Oh 
> well, guess that's solved then. :-)

hope so!
-- 
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>

Rick:   "How can you close me up?  On what grounds?"
Renault: "I'm shocked!  Shocked!  To find that gambling is going on here."
Croupier (handing money to Renault): "Your winnings, sir."
Renault:"Oh.  Thank you very much."
                -- Casablanca


Reply via email to