A bit offbeat... 1.25C cooling noted. d
http://www.truthout.org/121708M
India's Right Wing Wants Nuclear War
Wednesday 17 December 2008
by: J. Sri Raman, t r u t h o u t | Perspective
photo
Kuppahalli Sitaramayya Sudarshan of India's Rashtriya Swayamsevak
Sangh Party stated that nuclear war between India and Pakistan may be
necessary. (Photo: Reuters)
Mumbai's terrorist outrage of November 26 has found a response
truly matching it in madness. A call for a nuclear war - and nothing
less - has come as the culmination of warped and warlike reactions to
the traumatizing tragedy, which has claimed a toll of 200 lives.
The demented call, which still cannot, unfortunately, be dismissed
as inconsequential, is not only a regional war of the said, scary
description. It is also one for a global conflict of the kind.
Fittingly, the call has emanated from the real fuehrer of India's
far right. He may be relatively unknown to the outside world, and less
known even in his country than political leaders of the "parivar," as
the far-right "family" labels itself. But Kuppahalli Sitaramayya
Sudarshan is the supremo of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the
misleading name meaning the National Volunteers' Association.
The RSS holds a commanding position in the parivar, as its
patriarch and ideological fountainhead. It has a hold over the
political front of the "family," the main opposition Bharatiya Janata
Party (BJP), as well. Party leaders - even of such notoriety as
Narendra Modi, who gloried in the Gujarat pogrom of 2002, and of such
national-level ambitions as Lal Krishna Advani, styled as the "shadow
prime minister" - have always had to proclaim loyalty of the RSS from
time to time.
The RSS, as every political reporter in India knows, has tightened
its hold over the BJP in time for the parliamentary elections to be
held by May 2009. Sudarshan's clarion call came in the course of an
interview with a freelance journalist and was quoted first in a
leading Pakistani newspaper on December 12. Asked if India should go
for a full-fledged war with Pakistan, 77-year-old Sudarshan said, "If
there is no other way left. Whenever the demons start dominating this
planet, there is no way other than the war. Tell me if there is any
other way out. But war should be the last resort. Before that India
should consider other options."
That was his only attempt at sounding reasonable. Asked if such a
war would not escalate into a nuclear conflict, he was disarmingly
candid, "Yes, I know it will not stop there. It will be nuclear war
and a large number of people will perish."
The vision of the apocalypse was not restricted to the region. "In
fact, not me alone but many people around the world have expressed
their apprehension that this terrorism may ultimately result in a
Third World War. And this will be a nuclear war in which many of us
are going to be finished. But according to me, as of now, it is very
necessary to defeat the demons and there is no other way."
Then came the coup de grace: "And let me say with confidence that
after this destruction, a new world will emerge, which will be very
good, free from evil and terrorism."
He had hinted at his horrific vision earlier too. In January 2002,
when India and Pakistan traded nuclear threats during a terrifying
standoff in Kashmir and elsewhere, Sudarshan recalled epic Mahabharata
to make his point: "When [the] Mahabharata [war] was fought in
Kurukshetra, its repercussions were felt across the country but now
India was the Kurukshetra and the battle, if fought, would have its
effects across the globe."
In May 2005, in another media interview, he said that Pakistan-
controlled Kashmir (Azad Kashmir) should be "annexed by force." What
if there is a nuclear war? He said, "If it happens, it'll happen. We
can't keep quiet all the time because of the scare of nuclear
weapons."
It took a Mumbai, however, for Sudarshan to come out with his
blood-curdling call with barely a reservation or qualification.
As Sudarshan acknowledged, he knew what a nuclear war meant - for
the region and the world. Every reasonably educated person should know
as well, after so many expert studies on the subject.
According to one of the studies, for example, if five cities each
of India and Pakistan are hit in a nuclear war, about 1.7 million
people will be killed in India and about 1.2 million in Pakistan, or a
total of about three million in the region. If 15 cities of the two
countries (eight in India and seven in Pakistan) are nuked, according
to a classified Pentagon study, the toll could mount to 12 million
deaths. Carcinogenic black rain in coastal areas of Hiroshima-like
high humidity and the velocity of summer winds and dust storms
especially in the India-Pakistan border region will widen the fallout.
The global consequences will be no less grim - even if the conflict
remains regional and does not become a world war of Sudarshan's
vision. Ira Helfand, a US medical specialist, in a study of October
2007, projected "a total global death toll in the range of one billion
from starvation alone" as a result of the regional war over a period
of time.
Earlier studies have suggested that such a conflict would throw
five million tonnes of black soot into the atmosphere, causing a
reduction of 1.25 degrees Celsius in the average temperature at the
earth's surface for several years. Consequently, the annual growing
season in the world's most important grain-producing areas would
shrink by between 10 and 20 days. According to Helfand, the world was
ill prepared to cope with such a disaster. "Global grain stocks stand
at 49 days, lower than at any point in the past five decades. These
stocks would not provide any significant reserve in the event of a
sharp decline in production. We would see hoarding on a global scale."
All this was said quite sometime before the eruption of the latest
food crisis.
Yet another study estimates the smoke unleashed by 100 small 15-
kiloton nuclear warheads could destroy 30 percent to 40 percent of the
world's ozone layer. This is expected to kill off some food crops.
A Third World War with origins in this region may lead to the
emergence of a "terror-free" world of Sudarshan's special sense, but
it will be a significantly truncated world indeed, to go by all
available evidence. Nuclear militarism had always occupied a prominent
place on the ultra-nationalist agenda of the RSS and the parivar. The
BJP's parent body, the Jan Sangh, had demanded an Indian bomb, even in
1951, a full 13 years before China acquired nuclear weapons. The very
first thing the BJP-led government of former Prime Minister Atal
Bihari Vajpayee did in May 1998 was to conduct bomb tests and declare
India a nuclear-weapon state. The regret in parivar circles is that
the bomb is yet to be used.
During the Kargil conflict between India and Pakistan in 1999, the
RSS organ in Hindi, Panchjanya, wrote, "Pakistan will not listen just
like that. We have a centuries-old debt to settle with this [Islamic]
mindset. It is the same demon that has been throwing a challenge at
Durga [Hindu goddess] since the time of Mohammed bin Qasim [of Saudi
Arabia, eighth century, who conquered Sind and Punjab]."
Panchjanya added, "Arise, Atal Bihari! Who knows if fate has
destined you to be the author of the final chapter of this long story.
For what have we manufactured bombs? For what have exercised the
nuclear option?"
What makes Sudarshan's call scarier is the not so indirect support
he is receiving from supposedly apolitical "security" experts. Says
one of them, Marroof Raza, "The suggestion of external affairs
minister Pranab Mukherjee that India could exercise a military option
against Pakistan has alarmed the international community, particularly
the US, that a war between the two nuclear-armed neighbors could see
the first ever use of nuclear weapons by both sides. It is precisely
this nuclear nightmare scenario that Pakistan's establishment and its
military brass, in particular, have often exploited to blackmail the
world each time India wants to take them to task for their many acts
of terror...."
This sounds like a repetition of the RSS chief's rhetoric: "How
long can we keep quiet all the time because of the scare of nuclear
weapons?"
Satish Chandra, a former Indian ambassador to Pakistan and deputy
national security adviser in the Vajpayee government, said on December
14, "Terror outfits operating from Pakistan are state supported. Until
and unless we inflict pain on Pakistan we are not going to achieve
results." He added, "We have a variety of options before us. Water,
agriculture, covert action and economy are some of the options before
us to get the results. You have other options as well." The last
sentence can again sound Sudarshan-like to some.
Meanwhile, the post-Mumbai war of words between New Delhi and
Islamabad has served to illustrate the special danger of a nuclear
conflict in the specific regional context. What New Delhi described as
a "hoax call" was allegedly made to Pakistan President Asif Ali
Zardari on November 28 by a man who claimed to be India's External
Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee and spoke in a "threatening" tone.
The call threatened eruption of a military conflict, with Pakistan
placing its army on high alert and its air force moving aircraft to
forward bases on its front with India.
A semblance of normalcy has now been restored with Mukherjee
denying the call and Zardari officially accepting the denial. The
incident, however, has shown how well-founded are the apprehensions of
an accidental nuclear war in the region, voiced by the peace movements
in both the countries
Islamabad's official response to war cries from within India has
been an attempt to sound reasonable, but not without a counterwarning
of the same nuclear kind. Pakistan's Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani
told the country's parliament, "We are a nuclear power ... we want to
act in a graceful manner and we do not want to create an impression
that we are an irresponsible nation."
Surprisingly, no political party in India has so far reacted to
Sudarshan's call to nuclear arms. Parties and forces opposed to the
far right have, perhaps, chosen to treat his declaration with the
contempt it deserves, in their view. If they have done so, they are
indulging in an egregious error. The nuclear saber-rattling needs to
be taken with the utmost seriousness.
Particularly eloquent, of course, is the silence with which the
BJP has greeted the beating of the nuclear war drum. The BJP has
always found it impolitic to implement the parivar's agenda fully
while in power, which it has so far had to share with allies.
This, however, may precisely be the compulsion behind Sudarshan's
call. His interview, which the RSS has taken care to authenticate
officially, would appear designed to put pressure on the BJP against
deviating from the path of the parivar if it returns to power in five
months.
There may, thus, be a method in this nuclear madness.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
