Folks, The original goal of this googlegroup was to transmit information that would be useful to professionals and informed citizens concerned with issues relating to intentional intervention in the climate system.
The quality of posts on this group has, in my opinion, deteriorated to the point that it is no longer able to fulfill this primary purpose adequately. I think there are two basic options: 1. I can moderate this group more ruthlessly and reject any message that does not actually transmit new relevant information or raise a question that has not already been discussed at length. ( In this case, I will make many enemies as I reject messages from well-intentioned people. ) I will not have time to give each submitter of a rejected posting my reasons for rejecting the posting. 2. I can abandon this group to people with much more time on their hands. So, for me, the question is down to tightening the reigns, or letting them go. Comments? Best, Ken ___________________________________________________ Ken Caldeira Carnegie Institution Dept of Global Ecology 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA [email protected]; [email protected] http://dge.stanford.edu/DGE/CIWDGE/labs/caldeiralab +1 650 704 7212; fax: +1 650 462 5968 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
