Dear David‹Your comment on the situation regarding sea ice merits some
comment. Please take a look at the latest newsletter from the National Snow
and Ice Data Center at http://nsidc.org/pubs/notes/65/Notes_65_web.pdf  .
They make very clearly that we should indeed still be quite alarmed about
the meltback of Arctic sea ice.

Mike MacCracken


On 1/3/09 11:13 AM, "Ken Caldeira" <[email protected]> wrote:

> The following email to <[email protected]> was deemed more
> appropriate for <[email protected]>
> 
> John:
> 
> I have no science to confirm or dispute your concerns. The most recent
> graphs on sea ice I've seen shows things are returning toward the
> mean. I'm not prepared to increase alarms based on what I've seen.
> Further, the environmental groups have chosen to focus on only those
> subjects that avoid geoengineering. So, I really can not help the
> community in any useful manner. The necessary institutional structures
> are not in place and absent funding for that, I do not see a rapid
> flow of resources into research on geo.
> 
> Good luck.
> 
> David Schnare
> Center for Environmental Stewardship
> 
> On Jan 2, 2009, at 6:45 PM, John Nissen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks, Stephen.
>> >
>> > Although the Arctic tipping points and sea ice are specifically
>> > mentioned by Chris Rapley and Neil Wells, we have the situation that:
>> > (a) none of the other experts seem aware both that the sea ice is a
>> > potential tipping point for the Earth system - and (b) most
>> > importantly, none of them recognise that emissions reduction is
>> > useless to halt the retreat of the sea ice in the necessary
>> > timescale. Indeed it is not conceivable to halt the sea ice retreat
>> > without geoengineering to cool the region - and stratospheric aerosols
>> > and marine cloud brightening are probably the only two feasible
>> > techniques for cooling the region quickly enough to have a good chance
>> > of halting the sea ice retreat.
>> >
>> > BTW, I am really disappointed that neither David Schnare nor Albert
>> > Kallio made this point - I know Albert is as concerned as anyone
>> > about the speed of sea ice retreat and repercussions thereof.
>> >
>> > This is really bad news to begin 2009, as it was a chance missed.
>> >
>> > We can do better, and we must
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Jan 2, 1:18 pm, Stephen Salter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> . . . . and one more at
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/what-can-we-
>>> >> d...
>>> >>
>>> >> Stephen
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design
>>> >> School of Engineering and Electronics
>>> >> University of Edinburgh
>>> >> Mayfield Road
>>> >> Edinburgh EH9 3JL
>>> >> Scotland
>>> >> tel +44 131 650 5704
>>> >> fax +44 131 650 5702
>>> >> Mobile 07795 203 195
>>> >> [email protected]http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs
>>> <http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs>
>>> >>
>>> >> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> >> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> >
> ___________________________________________________
> Ken Caldeira
> 
> Carnegie Institution Dept of Global Ecology
> 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
> 
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> http://dge.stanford.edu/DGE/CIWDGE/labs/caldeiralab
> +1 650 704 7212; fax: +1 650 462 5968
> 
> 
> > 
> 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to