1 - Biomass Energy Carbon Capture and Storage is usually expressed as
'BECS'.  Biomass Carbon Capture and Storage would therefore be
BCCS/BCS
2 - Lackner's cold process works for air, so should work just fine for
CO2 rich stack emissions
3 - Shipping costs - Why not use steam trains that burn corn cob?
3 - Sinking - why not wrap up in big nylon sacks with rocks in to make
them sink.  This should discourage bottom-feeders, too.

A

2009/1/26 Stuart Strand <[email protected]>:
> That is an interesting point.   Since liquid CO2 capture from stationary
> sources (coal) and sequestration in deep strata must be a part of a
> sustainable mix of greenhouse gas control technologies, there may be enough
> free CO2 to release.   But some current deep injection ideas involve
> carbonate mineral formation in basalt.  And then there is the leakage
> problem.  Or we could save some coal…
>
>
>
>
>
>   = Stuart =
>
>
>
> Stuart E. Strand
>
> 167 Wilcox Hall, Box 352700, Univ. Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
>
> voice 206-543-5350, fax 206-685-3836
>
> skype:  stuartestrand
>
> http://faculty.washington.edu/sstrand/
>
>
>
> From: Eugene I. Gordon [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 3:31 PM
> To: Stuart Strand; [email protected]; 'geoengineering'; 'greenhouse effect'
> Cc: 'James Lovelock'; 'James Hansen'; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [geo] Re: Crop residue ocean permanent sequestration
>
>
>
> I would argue that any sequestration technique for CO2 should allow its
> release back into the atmosphere when needed. Why needed? For sure when the
> nominal background level of CO2 in the atmosphere drops to 180 ppm as the
> Antarctic cools following the end of the current 20,000 year component of
> the Milankovitch cycle. That will take place relatively soon. When the Earth
> so cools we will be glad to have enough CO2 stored to put back 100 ppm and
> achieve acceptable climate. We should view geoengineering techniques as a
> thermostat that works both ways as needed.
>
>
>
> One of the elegant aspects of carbon sequestration techniques is that they
> do no damage. Capture and storage fits that category.
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to