Hi Ray and Gene,

I think there is still hope, if we can change the way people look at the situation.  This is where security of food supplies comes in...

If we can get the politicians to realise that global warming is a SECURITY issue, then they may also be able to think of global warming as an enemy - a common enemy for all mankind.  This is the big "mind set" change which is needed.

Only when everybody sees a common enemy will they unite - to attack the enemy.  This is part of the human psyche.  But while global warming is seen as a consequence of lavish, resource-hungry life-styles, the battle will be between those who want to defend those life-styles, and the rest of humanity.

Only when global warming is seen as an enemy can people face the consequences of defeat.  Before that time, talk of the consequences is branded as "doom-mongering" and therefore necessarily unscientific.   Thus the collapse of our own civilisation has been a taboo subject.

Only when global warming is seen as an enemy, will a proper strategy for attack be developed - with due attention to the most critical aspects, establishing the time-scale for action, assessing weapons capabilities, plugging gaps, establishing resource requirements, budgeting, cementing strategic alliances between nations, and sorting out a plan of campaign.

Then people will realise that geoengineering techniques, such as solar radiation management and carbon air capture, are essential weapons to attack the enemy, particularly on the fronts where the enemy is most advanced.

And people will realise that the side-effects from particular geoengineering techniques have to be seen in the light of what the techniques can do to win the war.

And people will realise that the sooner one can deploy these techniques the better, where the enemy is building up strength, has an arsenal at the ready, and/or is most unpredictable (as in the Arctic).

Cheers,

John

---

Eugene I. Gordon wrote:
It is too bad that humans cannot overcome their basic selfishness and greed
and deal with such issues. Burying children that have starved to death is
the ultimate monument to man's stupidity and inherent flaws. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Taylor
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 3:56 AM
To: geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Starvation - the great leveller


I think you're right on the button with this John. Global famine is going to
be the ultimate wake up call. Unfortunately FAO and others predict european
and north american harvests to increase for at least 10 years, which will
mask what's happening to yields in southern africa etc. as far as global
wheat price is concerned.

This is why I think for now the messages have to be positive and obviously
doable:

(As per the book "The Tipping Point", the psychological environment doesn't
help doom messages to be "sticky".)

- early emissions reductions of HFC23 and other short-lived forcings

- priority to energy efficiency, cement sector, aluminium recycling etc

- opportunties in localisation

- lots of research/pilots on CCS, geoengineering, land-atmosphere etc

- focus on green growth and technology transfer

- attention to land-atmosphere interactions and flood prevention

Hopefully there will be no deal in Copenhagen except on short-lived
forcings, which will ramp up the pressure for a good deal in Mexico 2010.

Ray

On Jun 27, 10:16 pm, John Nissen <[email protected]> wrote:
  
When it comes to the prospect of starvation, all other issues will 
become secondary.  Widespread crop failure may be the first major 
impact
    




  

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to