Hi Alvia I wasn't so much trying to advocate specific geoengineering strategies over others, but reframe the debate/concept so that it's less attractive to techies and more palatable to a wider range of thinkers (eg people who have experience of febrile illnesses or are involved health care).
I can see that talking about population and ice ages has introduced unnecessary material that provokes unhelpful responses well off my main intended themes, so in that respect I am grateful for your time and your response. Thank you. > Reduce the human population to 2 billion? Are you serious? over 1-3 centuries, yes > What do you > propose, a lottery? and check out this article on how it will actually happen (probably) http://www.paulchefurka.ca/Africa/Africa.html http://www.paulchefurka.ca/Population.html http://www.paulchefurka.ca/WEAP/WEAP.html > We could simply nuke India and China right now, that's > about one third of "the problem." Alvia this is offensive and beneath you. If meant to be a joke, it's both unfunny and unclear that you intend humour. Ray --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
