On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Sam Carana <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Anyone who has done a bit of study into biochar will acknowledge biochar's
> essential role in a comprehensive approach to deal with global warming.


Sam,

If such research does indeed exist, then it should be fairly easy for
yourself, Ron or Peter to refute the arguments put forth in the extract of
RS report posted by Simon Evans and reposted by Ken and included once again
below.

“Proponents of biomass for sequestration argue that very large rates
of sequestration are in principle achievable. For example, Lehmann et
al. (2006), quote a potential carbon sink of 5.5 to 9.5 GtC/yr by
2100, larger than the present day fossil fuel source (and approaching
10% of global primary production by plants). Such fluxes suppose that
there will be enormous growth in the resources devoted to the
production of biofuels, and that some large fraction of this carbon
would be converted to biochar. The use of crops for renewable fuels on
such a scale would very likely conflict with the use of agricultural
land for the production of food and/or biofuels.

As summarised in Table 2.4 biomass for sequestration could be a
significant small-scale contributor to a geoengineering approach to
enhancing the global terrestrial carbon sink, and it could, under the
right circumstances, also be a benign agricultural practice. However,
unless the sustainable sequestration rate exceeds around 1 GtC/yr, it
is unlikely that it could make a large contribution. As is the case
with biofuels, there is also the significant risk that inappropriately
applied incentives to encourage biochar might increase the cost and
reduce the availability of food crops, if growing biomass feedstocks
becomes more profitable than growing food.”


Manu

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to