Wont the salt spray melt the icebergs?

On Oct 4, 12:36 am, "Peter Read" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just a thought
> Once you've got the ice bergs to stop near an entrance to this or some other 
> channel then maybe spend all winter spraying salt water onto it that freezes 
> and gradually weighs the bergs down till they sit on the bottom.  Then spray 
> some more on so it sits on the bottom good and hard.  And then some more to 
> make sure there's enough left at the end of the summer.  
> How many tons of salt water spray?  How much fuel to shift it?? How much CO2 
> emitted??? More harm than good ????
> Anyway, maybe the channel will block up enough all the way back to where the 
> glacier is falling into the water and stop it from sliding off Greenland (or 
> Antacrtica) and all will be well ??  
> Or do some people live up this channel? Do they want to get in and out in 
> summer time??  Maybe build a road.  Or shift them like the Tuvalese.  
> Politics again.  Hmmm.
> Peter
>
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: John Nissen
>   To: [email protected]
>   Cc: [email protected] ; Geoengineering ; Risto Isomaki ; Esko Pettay
>   Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 10:42 PM
>   Subject: [geo] Re: Robeson Channel Suitable for Suspension Cabling to Block 
> Prevent Southward Ice Movement
>
>   Hi all,
>
>   Some time ago, Albert and I discussed cables and barriers at length - and 
> at a length to cross straits.  You really want a valve, that will let ice 
> flow in one direction (North) but not the other (South).  It's quite 
> difficult to do that with a cable.
>
>   My thoughts are that a floating barrier might be best.  It can be rounded 
> and point into the ice, so that ice pressure becomes a compression of the 
> barrier.  Basically what you want is to create an ice jam of ice flows (or 
> icebergs) on one side of the barrier which would then take most of the 
> pressure as the ice builds up.  The barrier could be made across a fjord or 
> across straits.
>
>   The barrier would be made of sections, so it could come apart to let ice 
> flow in the opposite direction (possibly in two sections, like canal lock 
> gates).  The barrier could possibly be made out of pykrete [1], which has 
> excellent compressional strength (over twice as strong as normal ice) and 
> good tensile strength as well (much better than concrete) to give it 
> rigidity, while having a density less than water so it floats (just).
>
>   One major problem with such a barrier (across straits) could be when the 
> wind is from the North, while the sea current is from the South, keeping the 
> barrier open.
>
>   BTW, I've seen recent research suggesting that there is a stable weather 
> condition which can sit over the North Pole, with winds which tend to 
> disperse the ice.  This condition is considered to have been instrumental in 
> the unprecedented sea ice retreat in 2007.  Perhaps one of you can find a 
> reference, please.
>
>   Cheers from Chiswick,
>
>   John
>
>   [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pykrete
>
>   Mike MacCracken wrote:
>     What about doing this across Jakobshaven and other fjords that allow ice 
> streams to flow rapidly?
>
>     Mike
>
>     On 10/1/09 9:25 AM, "Veli Albert Kallio" <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>       Dear All,
>
>       Please find enclosed a brief satellite animation on the Robeson Channel 
> from this summer which suggest that use of bridge-style suspension cabling 
> could hold ice in place and prevent it moving into the warm waters further 
> along the channel between Ellesmere Island and Greenland. The link attached 
> below which shows the summertime ice movements.
>
>       The shortest suspension cables would be Ellesmere - Hans Island - 
> Greenland each stretch about 10 kilometres in length. (The concept is to 
> create ice congestion behind barrier that is self-locking jam of pack ice 
> behind cable that remains longer in the cold waters.)
>
>       On the negative side, the ice amount south of any successful cable 
> barriers will decrease. The impact of cables for boats, whales and perhaps 
> other large fish and wild life would also have to be addressed. After 
> melting, the barrier cable is lowered to the seafloor when ice is on 
> northward move or there is a lack of ice, the barrier is raised up to surface 
> whenever there is ice flow moving southward. It is also raised up to surface 
> for the winter freeze.
>
>       In Nunavut, the suspension cabling could help to keep the North West 
> Passage clear of thick sea ice floes that damage ships while preserving ice 
> on the north side of the channel. This might help justify such a system at 
> least in Nunavut. The profile of the Swalbard Islands and Franz Joseph Land 
> could also be enlarged by blocking the straights by cables. This would 
> increase the ice congestion behind these archipelagoes and decrease some sea 
> ice escape from the high Arctic Basin.
>
>       I have not considered blocking of the Fram Staight due to its width, 
> but materially the largest amount of sea ice loss through escape will occur 
> there. The barriers can slow down ice movement and loss to the south due to 
> decreases in ice movements but if ice melts away due to warm weather behind 
> barrier, these measures become all but useless.
>
>       Kind regards,
>
>       Albert
>
>       From: [email protected]
>       To: [email protected]
>       Subject: Greenpeace dokumentoi pohjoisen pallonpuoliskon jäätiköiden 
> sulamista
>       Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:18:14 +0300
>
>      
> http://www.greenpeace.org/finland/fi/mediakeskus/lehdistotiedotteet/g...<http://www.greenpeace.org/finland/fi/mediakeskus/lehdistotiedotteet/g...>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>       View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place - Learn more! 
> <http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---
>
>   No virus found in this incoming message.
>   Checked by AVG -www.avg.com
>   Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.115/2405 - Release Date: 09/30/09 
> 10:35:00- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to