Dear Group, I remember back in the 60's and 70's big tobacco (and Fred Singer) argued that tobacco smoke was not harmful. Then in the 70's and 80's big industry (and Fred Singer) argued that CFC were not really destroying ozone. After that big oil (and Fred Singer) argued global warming was a hoax.
The lesson we can learn is, if you can keep your losing argument in controversy long enough, you can continue to make big money. With ensuing dimness some (not Fred Singer this time) will suck away, with their little filings, the crumbs that exist from more plausible solutions in order to show their investors progress in our scheme. Sincerely, Oliver Wingenter PS When in doubt, raise doubt! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
