Hi All We should always encourage replication and rigorous testing of new scientific claims, especially those which would overturn all our present preconceived ideas.
The demonstration of the Steorn free energy motor by JLN labs would be more convincing to boringly pedantic classical physicists and engineers if the baseboard had been suspended by non-conducting string, all instrumentation had been self contained and if the rotation had continued for a period much longer than the charge in the capacitor replacing any on-board batteries. It would cost very little to do this, just a ball of string and a moderate size electrolytic capacitor. I am willing to provide both. Can this be done? Stephen (Boringly pedantic engineer) Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design School of Engineering and Electronics University of Edinburgh Mayfield Road Edinburgh EH9 3JL Scotland tel +44 131 650 5704 fax +44 131 650 5702 Mobile 07795 203 195 [email protected] http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs Manu Sharma wrote: > A French researcher claims to have replicated the controversial free > energy device of Steorn -- the Irish company that claimed in August > 2006 that it has developed a free energy (popularly "perpetual > motion") device. > > The device breaks the laws of thermodynamics and is impossible > according to current science although Zero Point Energy (which these > devices claim to tap) is a valid phenomenon. > > Since 2006, Steorn has had a checkered history. To highlight the main > events: > > * Steorn organised a jury of scientists in 2007 which were given > this device to test for two years. > * Steorn demoed the device for public (in 2008, I think), but the > demo failed as the device could not work. > * They blamed it on the bearings and kept working to improve the > flawed components. > * Meanwhile Steorn licensed the technology to around 300 > developers who were given the schematics (for free, I believe) > to develop the device. > * The scientific jury finally gave the verdict earlier this year > and said the device _did not_ work as Steorn claimed. > * On 15 December, Steorn released an improved version of the > device in a public demo in Dublin. > * Now someone (perhaps from the 300 developers who were licensed > the technology) has apparently replicated the design. > > Steorn - official website <http://www.steorn.com/> > /Steorn/ - Wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steorn> > JLN Labs replicates Steorn's free energy motor > <http://pesn.com/2009/12/28/9501599_Steorn_e-Orbo_replicated_by_JL_Naudin/> > > Note that I'm only reporting facts here regarding what seems to be an > interesting development. I'm not qualified to claim that this is > a bona-fide free energy device or that such a device is even possible. > > I personally maintain that given the tremendous possible benefits, all > such claims should be given serious scientific scrutiny regardless of > the challenge they pose to conventional understanding of > physics. Members are free to form their own conclusion. > > -- Manu > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "geoengineering" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
