Manu,

I have placed you on the "moderation" list at
[email protected].

This is not the appropriate group for the description of inventions that
break the laws of thermodynamics.

Best,

Ken

___________________________________________________
Ken Caldeira

Carnegie Institution Dept of Global Ecology
260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA

[email protected]
http://dge.stanford.edu/DGE/CIWDGE/labs/caldeiralab
+1 650 704 7212; fax: +1 650 462 5968




On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Stephen Salter <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All
>
> We should always encourage replication and rigorous testing of new
> scientific claims, especially those which would overturn all our present
> preconceived ideas.
>
> The demonstration of the Steorn free energy motor by JLN labs would be
> more convincing to boringly pedantic classical physicists and engineers
> if the baseboard had been suspended by non-conducting string, all
> instrumentation had been self contained and if the rotation had
> continued for a period much longer than the charge in the capacitor
> replacing any on-board batteries.  It would cost very little to do this,
> just a ball of string and a moderate size electrolytic capacitor.  I am
> willing to provide both.   Can this be done?
>
> Stephen
>
> (Boringly pedantic engineer)
>
> Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design
> School of Engineering and Electronics
> University of Edinburgh
> Mayfield Road
> Edinburgh EH9 3JL
> Scotland
> tel +44 131 650 5704
> fax +44 131 650 5702
> Mobile  07795 203 195
> [email protected]
> http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs <http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/%7Eshs>
>
>
>
> Manu Sharma wrote:
> > A French researcher claims to have replicated the controversial free
> > energy device of Steorn -- the Irish company that claimed in August
> > 2006 that it has developed a free energy (popularly "perpetual
> > motion") device.
> >
> > The device breaks the laws of thermodynamics and is impossible
> > according to current science although Zero Point Energy (which these
> > devices claim to tap) is a valid phenomenon.
> >
> > Since 2006, Steorn has had a checkered history. To highlight the main
> > events:
> >
> >     * Steorn organised a jury of scientists in 2007 which were given
> >       this device to test for two years.
> >     * Steorn demoed the device for public (in 2008, I think), but the
> >       demo failed as the device could not work.
> >     * They blamed it on the bearings and kept working to improve the
> >       flawed components.
> >     * Meanwhile Steorn licensed the technology to around 300
> >       developers who were given the schematics (for free, I believe)
> >       to develop the device.
> >     * The scientific jury finally gave the verdict earlier this year
> >       and said the device _did not_ work as Steorn claimed.
> >     * On 15 December, Steorn released an improved version of the
> >       device in a public demo in Dublin.
> >     * Now someone (perhaps from the 300 developers who were licensed
> >       the technology) has apparently replicated the design.
> >
> > Steorn - official website <http://www.steorn.com/>
> > /Steorn/ - Wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steorn>
> > JLN Labs replicates Steorn's free energy motor
> > <
> http://pesn.com/2009/12/28/9501599_Steorn_e-Orbo_replicated_by_JL_Naudin/>
> >
> > Note that I'm only reporting facts here regarding what seems to be an
> > interesting development. I'm not qualified to claim that this is
> > a bona-fide free energy device or that such a device is even possible.
> >
> > I personally maintain that given the tremendous possible benefits, all
> > such claims should be given serious scientific scrutiny regardless of
> > the challenge they pose to conventional understanding of
> > physics. Members are free to form their own conclusion.
> >
> > -- Manu
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "geoengineering" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<geoengineering%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<geoengineering%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.


Reply via email to