Sounds like the UK will go 1, 2 in this race.

John Gorman wrote:
Thanks for this Ken. Once again someone in California tells me about something in my own back yard that I hadn't heard of. Can any UK academic or university person explain whats going on here. Have we got a race between the National Environmental Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council to take control of geoengineering research? Sounds like fun! The more the merrier! john gorman

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* Ken Caldeira <mailto:[email protected]>
    *To:* geoengineering <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Tuesday, January 26, 2010 4:23 PM
    *Subject:* [geo] NERC geoengineering public dialogue - progress
    update (fwd)

    see: http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering.asp

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0000
    From: Geoengineering Geoengineering <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    To: Geoengineering Geoengineering <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Subject: NERC geoengineering public dialogue - progress update

    Dear all,

    A progress update on the NERC public dialogue on geoengineering is
    below.


    1) Contractors
    We are pleased to announce that Ipsos MORI, working with Dialogue
    by Design and the British Science Association, have been chosen to
    design and run the workshop sessions and open access events for
    the dialogue. Collingwood Environmental Planning will run an
    independent evaluation of the dialogue process.

    2) Steering group
    Details of steering group membership have been posted on the
    geoengineering public dialogue page of the NERC website
    (http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering.asp) The
    steering group is chaired by Professor Charles Godfray of the
    University of Oxford , and includes representatives from academia,
    government, industry and charities.

    3) Hopes and concerns about geoengineering
    Finally, we'd like to thank all who sent in views on their hopes
    and concerns about potential geoengineering technologies, and on
    what questions we should ask as part of the dialogue. Your
    comments will be collated and passed on to the steering group and
    Ipsos MORI as they develop plans for the dialogue workshops.


    Please feel free to forward this e-mail to colleagues. You can
    contact [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> if you have any queries or
    would like to be removed from our mailing list.


    Regards,

    Peter Hurrell
    Stakeholder Liaison Officer | Knowledge Exchange Team
    Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

    Putting NERC science to use: find out more through NERC’s Science
    Impacts Database<http://sid.nerc.ac.uk/>

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "geoengineering" group.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected].
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to