You must have missed my post on Dec. 30 about this John. Andrew, John
Nissen & I all sent a response to the NERC. (Those pesky Californians
do have very good communication skills though.)

On Jan 26, 6:03 pm, "John Gorman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for this Ken. Once again someone in California tells me about 
> something in my own back yard that I hadn't heard of.
>
> Can any UK academic or university person explain whats going on here. Have we 
> got a race between the National Environmental Research Council and the 
> Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council to take control of 
> geoengineering research?
>
> Sounds like fun! The more the merrier!
>
> john gorman
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Ken Caldeira
>   To: geoengineering
>   Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 4:23 PM
>   Subject: [geo] NERC geoengineering public dialogue - progress update (fwd)
>
>   see:http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering.asp
>
>   ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>   Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0000
>   From: Geoengineering Geoengineering <[email protected]>
>   To: Geoengineering Geoengineering <[email protected]>
>   Subject: NERC geoengineering public dialogue - progress update
>
>   Dear all,
>
>   A progress update on the NERC public dialogue on geoengineering is below.
>
>   1) Contractors
>   We are pleased to announce that Ipsos MORI, working with Dialogue by Design 
> and the British Science Association, have been chosen to design and run the 
> workshop sessions and open access events for the dialogue. Collingwood 
> Environmental Planning will run an independent evaluation of the dialogue 
> process.
>
>   2) Steering group
>   Details of steering group membership have been posted on the geoengineering 
> public dialogue page of the NERC website 
> (http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering.asp) The steering group 
> is chaired by Professor Charles Godfray of the University of Oxford , and 
> includes representatives from academia, government, industry and charities.
>
>   3) Hopes and concerns about geoengineering
>   Finally, we'd like to thank all who sent in views on their hopes and 
> concerns about potential geoengineering technologies, and on what questions 
> we should ask as part of the dialogue. Your comments will be collated and 
> passed on to the steering group and Ipsos MORI as they develop plans for the 
> dialogue workshops.
>
>   Please feel free to forward this e-mail to colleagues. You can contact 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if you have any 
> queries or would like to be removed from our mailing list.
>
>   Regards,
>
>   Peter Hurrell
>   Stakeholder Liaison Officer | Knowledge Exchange Team
>   Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
>
>   Putting NERC science to use: find out more through NERC’s Science Impacts 
> Database<http://sid.nerc.ac.uk/>
>
>   --
>   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
>   To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
>   For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to