Dear Mike,
Yes, but it was clear at the conference that there is a void in global
governance on this issue, and that new institutions need to be created
to deal with this issue.
Certainly the issue of Arctic influence needs to be investigated with
climate models, but the size of in situ experimentation that could be
deemed safe and not needing consultation with others, was also not
decided. People discussed various parameters in time and space, but
there was no consensus. So until the governance of the research is in
hand, it is certainly premature for a group of gung-ho engineers to ask
the Arctic Council about anything.
Alan
Alan Robock, Professor II
Director, Meteorology Undergraduate Program
Associate Director, Center for Environmental Prediction
Department of Environmental Sciences Phone: +1-732-932-9800 x6222
Rutgers University Fax: +1-732-932-8644
14 College Farm Road E-mail: [email protected]
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551 USA http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock
On 4/15/2010 8:47 PM, Mike MacCracken wrote:
Dear Alan et al---Just a note that the Asilomar Conference was focused
on issues relating to guidelines for research, not to issues that need
investigation through research, as does the question of how much of an
influence in one region it might take to have a significant effect in
another region.
Mike MacCracken
On 4/15/10 8:28 PM, "Alan Robock" <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Josh,
You forget one thing. The Arctic Council has absolutely no
jurisdiction over global climate. And you cannot confine
geoengineering to the Arctic. These were clear conclusions from
the Asilomar Conference. You are jumping the gun.
The Icelandic volcano so far has put out very little SO2, and will
have no climatic impact. Yet it shut down air traffic over Europe.
Alan
Alan Robock, Professor II
Director, Meteorology Undergraduate Program
Associate Director, Center for Environmental Prediction
Department of Environmental Sciences Phone: +1-732-932-9800
x6222
Rutgers University Fax:
+1-732-932-8644
14 College Farm Road E-mail:
[email protected]
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551 USA
http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock
<http://envsci.rutgers.edu/%7Erobock>
On 4/15/2010 6:37 PM, Josh wrote:
Is anyone aware of organized efforts to place geoengineering
on the
agenda of the Arctic Council? Several commentators have
raised this
possibility, but I am unaware of any systematic effort to
accomplish
this. Focusing on the Arctic Council offers a number of
advantages:
- The Arctic Council is much less politicized than bodies like
UNFCCC. Indeed, the AC is unknown to the general public. The AC
would provide a forum that is less heated, less
confrontational, and
less burdened by the weight of history.
- Membership in the AC is relatively small and manageable. It is
composed of relatively developed countries with the resources to
pursue geoengineering. Most of those countries that have
indicated
some degree of openness to intervention belong to the AC.
- Given that the Arctic is disproportionately affected by climate
change, the AC and its member states would be more likely to
consider
climate interventions. In the Arctic, climate is changing and
people
know it. Native peoples may be supportive of geoengineering.
- Arctic climate change is an urgent issue, so geoengineering
in the
Arctic is a logical place to begin. A limited geographic
focus would
diminish opposition and give the science a chance to prove itself.
For these and other reasons, the AC offers a promising venue
for field
tests and possible deployment. Nature has also provided us with a
potential public relations coup - the current Iceland volcano. If
this eruption could be shown to result in reduced temperatures,
thicker sea ice, more polar bear cubs, etc., the argument for
stratospheric injections would look much more compelling.
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
