|
Hi Ron, There are two requirements that never seem to get mentioned, in official studies: 1. The need to bring down CO2 level in the atmosphere below 350 ppm, to avoid further ocean acidification, and potential catastrophic breakdown of the marine food chain; 2. The need to cool the Arctic to prevent inexorable melting of permafrost with catastrophic methane release and inexorable (or sudden) disintegration of Greenland ice sheet with catastrophic sea level rise. Both these require geoengineering as part of the solution, since emissions reductions alone cannot solve these problems on the necessary timescale. I challenge anybody from the Met Office to dispute this. BTW, scientists such as Hansen want (1) for reasons of global warming, and may put ocean acidification as a secondary consideration. Cheers, John --- [email protected] wrote: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. |
- [geo] New Met Resource on Geoengineering Wil Burns
- Re: [geo] New Met Resource on Geoengineering rongretlarson
- Re: [geo] New Met Resource on Geoengineering John Nissen
- Re: [geo] New Met Resource on Geoengineering rongretlarson
