Hi everyone,

I am finalizing a chapter on geoengineering policy for publication and
would greatly appreciate informed feedback on the following paragraph:

"The aerosol most commonly suggested for stratospheric injection is
sulfuric acid.   Plans call for delivering sulfate aerosols by
dispersing gas-phase precursor materials.  Precursor oxidation and
aerosol formation involve complex processes with the potential to
reduce the effectiveness of stratospheric insertion.  For instance,
coagulation could lead to excessively large sulfuric acid particles
that sediment out of the stratosphere, neutralizing the effect of the
initial dispersion.   Multiple, independent injections would increase
the likelihood of such unintended consequences.  Unsynchronized
staging, scheduling, and delivery of sulfate aerosol injections would
magnify the potential for perverse particulate interactions, and might
jeopardize the success of geoengineering deployment.  Lack of policy
coordination may result in separate injection schemes that effectively
cancel each other out."

For those with scientific/technical backgrounds, is this a sound
argument?  Is the basic science correct?  I am outside my comfort zone
with this and want to be sure I don't miss the mark.  Thanks to anyone
who can offer insight.

Josh Horton
[email protected]
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to