Actually I think that's pretty sensible. Why not let civil society groups in? Why not bring more ethics and social science experts in, maybe in a separate session?
We don't want to look like a bunch of mad scientists. The history of scientists crossing over into social policy is hardly glorious. Think eugenics. Best to be seen to be transparent A On 15 Jun 2011 03:57, "Michael Hayes" <[email protected]> wrote: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
