The IMechE and the Royal Society in the UK would be a good place to
start - they both have independent credibility.

Perhaps Prof. Shepperd would be willing to make the geoengineering
ctte permanent?

A

On 19 June 2011 15:55, Ken Caldeira <[email protected]> wrote:
> Needless consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.
> It might be good if done well.
> I think key would be being as centrist and reasonable as possible. Make as
> few claims as possible as an organization. Make sure all such statements of
> the organization are well-founded and board approved. Avoid any statements
> that would make the organization seem outside the scientific or political
> mainstream.
> Balance this with rapid response to developments in the news cycle to
> maximize media exposure. Participate in NGO activities around meetings of
> the parties of various conventions.
> There are real political and strategic questions:  is it better to promote a
> broad brush approach to reducing climate risk (including emission reduction,
> adaptation etc) or narrowly focus on CDR and/or SRM?
> (My preference would be the former.)
> Another question: is there a suitable existing org that would take this up
> as a campaign?
> Ken Caldeira
> [email protected]
> +1 650 704 7212
> http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab
> Sent from a limited-typing keyboard
> On Jun 19, 2011, at 1:47, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It doesn't need a lot of money to do do this.
>
> Some time ago I suggested a formal membership organisation, which would be
> the obvious focus for media attention
>
> At the time ken argued against the idea, and it seemed to die at that point.
>
> Is there now any support for establishing a "geoengineering studies society
> "
>
> A
>
> On 19 Jun 2011 00:57, "Michael Hayes" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to