This seems to add nothing to Martin HEIDIGGER's work, as wiki puts it:

The essence of modern technology is the conversion of the whole universe of
beings into an undifferentiated "standing reserve" (*Bestand*) of energy
available for any use to which humans choose to put it. Heidegger described
the essence of modern technology as
*Gestell<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestell>
*, or "enframing." Heidegger does not unequivocally condemn technology:
while he acknowledges that modern technology contains grave dangers,
Heidegger nevertheless also argues that it may constitute a chance for human
beings to enter a new epoch in their relation to being.

Gregory Benford

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Lockley
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> http://www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/events/events/main/talk_by_clive_hamilton
>
> Event:  Talk on Geoengineering by Clive Hamilton
> Date & Time:    27th Jun 2011 4:00pm-5:30pm
>
> Description:
> Clive Hamilton (an Academic Visitor based at the Oxford Uehiro Centre)
> is to give a talk for the Oxford Geoengineering Programme as follows:
> Venue: Oxford Martin School, Old Indian Institute (corner of Holywell
> and Catte Streets), 34 Broad Street.
> http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/contact/
> Title:  Rethinking Geoengineering and the Meaning of the Climate Crisis
> Abstract: This paper develops a critique of the consequentialist
> approach to the ethics of geoengineering, the approach that deploys
> assessment of costs and benefits in a risk framework to justify
> climatic intervention.
> He argues that there is a strong case for preferring the natural, and
> that the unique and highly threatening character of global warming
> renders the standard approach to the ethics of climate change
> unsustainable. Moreover, the unstated metaphysical assumption of
> conventional ethical, economic and policy thinking—modernity’s idea of
> the autonomous human subject analyzing and acting on an inert external
> world—is the basis for the kind of “technological thinking” that lies
> at the heart of the climate crisis.
> Technological thinking both projects a systems framework onto the
> natural world and frames it as a catalogue of resources for the
> benefit of humans. Recent discoveries by Earth system science
> itself—the arrival of the Anthropocene, the prevalence of
> non-linearities, and the deep complexity of the earth’s processes—hint
> at the inborn flaws in this kind of thinking. The grip of
> technological thinking explains why it has been so difficult for us to
> heed the warnings of climate science and why the idea of using
> technology to take control of the earth’s atmosphere is immediately
> appealing.
> Brief Bio:  Clive Hamilton is Professor of Public Ethics at the Centre
> for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE) and holds the newly
> created Vice-Chancellor's Chair at Charles Sturt University,
> Australia. He was the Founder and for 14 years the Executive Director
> of The Australia Institute, a public interest think tank. He is well
> known in Australia as a public intellectual and for his contributions
> to public policy debate. His extensive publications include writings
> on climate change policy, overconsumption, welfare policy and the
> effects of commercialisation. Recent publications include The Freedom
> Paradox: Towards a post-secular ethics and Requiem for a Species: Why
> we resist the truth about climate change
> All welcome, no booking required.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to