Dear all, There are some excellent works on climate ethics. Here are two that I enjoyed ...
The Ethics of Climate Change, James Garvey, Continuum International Publishing Group, London, 2008. One World, The Ethics of Globalization, Peter Singer, Yale University Press, New Haven, 2004 (2nd edition). Peter Singer's book has some eye-opening stuff in it. Tom. ++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 6/20/2011 11:36 AM, Gregory Benford wrote:
This seems to add nothing to Martin HEIDIGGER's work, as wiki puts it: The essence of modern technology is the conversion of the whole universe of beings into an undifferentiated "standing reserve" (/Bestand/) of energy available for any use to which humans choose to put it. Heidegger described the essence of modern technology as /Gestell <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestell>/, or "enframing." Heidegger does not unequivocally condemn technology: while he acknowledges that modern technology contains grave dangers, Heidegger nevertheless also argues that it may constitute a chance for human beings to enter a new epoch in their relation to being. Gregory Benford On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Lockley <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: http://www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/events/events/main/talk_by_clive_hamilton Event: Talk on Geoengineering by Clive Hamilton Date & Time: 27th Jun 2011 4:00pm-5:30pm Description: Clive Hamilton (an Academic Visitor based at the Oxford Uehiro Centre) is to give a talk for the Oxford Geoengineering Programme as follows: Venue: Oxford Martin School, Old Indian Institute (corner of Holywell and Catte Streets), 34 Broad Street. http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/contact/ Title: Rethinking Geoengineering and the Meaning of the Climate Crisis Abstract: This paper develops a critique of the consequentialist approach to the ethics of geoengineering, the approach that deploys assessment of costs and benefits in a risk framework to justify climatic intervention. He argues that there is a strong case for preferring the natural, and that the unique and highly threatening character of global warming renders the standard approach to the ethics of climate change unsustainable. Moreover, the unstated metaphysical assumption of conventional ethical, economic and policy thinking—modernity’s idea of the autonomous human subject analyzing and acting on an inert external world—is the basis for the kind of “technological thinking” that lies at the heart of the climate crisis. Technological thinking both projects a systems framework onto the natural world and frames it as a catalogue of resources for the benefit of humans. Recent discoveries by Earth system science itself—the arrival of the Anthropocene, the prevalence of non-linearities, and the deep complexity of the earth’s processes—hint at the inborn flaws in this kind of thinking. The grip of technological thinking explains why it has been so difficult for us to heed the warnings of climate science and why the idea of using technology to take control of the earth’s atmosphere is immediately appealing. Brief Bio: Clive Hamilton is Professor of Public Ethics at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE) and holds the newly created Vice-Chancellor's Chair at Charles Sturt University, Australia. He was the Founder and for 14 years the Executive Director of The Australia Institute, a public interest think tank. He is well known in Australia as a public intellectual and for his contributions to public policy debate. His extensive publications include writings on climate change policy, overconsumption, welfare policy and the effects of commercialisation. Recent publications include The Freedom Paradox: Towards a post-secular ethics and Requiem for a Species: Why we resist the truth about climate change All welcome, no booking required. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:geoengineering%[email protected]>. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
