Here's someone who used plastic liner to collect methane released by
21 million gallons of decomposing cow manure
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704266504575142224096848264.html

I'm not sure whether this worked!

Cheers!
Sam Carana



On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:39 PM, John Nissen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Peter,
>
> Thanks for your reply.  Stephen has suggested a means of capturing methane,
> which would catch the oil as well, using a large area of plastic membrane
> held down at its edges by weighted tyres (or something just heavier than
> water).  It wouldn't solve the general problem of natural blow-out, e.g. in
> ESAS, which concerns Shakhova et al. (2008) [1], because you would not know
> in advance where the blow-out might take place; but it could solve the
> problem when there is drilling on a particular site - so the blow-out is
> restricted to a limited, known area (less than say 1 km-2).  The membrane
> would be submerged and held over the danger area (anchored by the weights)
> when the sea ice has retreated.   In a blow-out, the gas would push the
> membrane up to the surface - under the ice if there is ice - with the
> weights still holding down the edges.  So you'd get something looking like
> an underwater hot-air balloon!  You could then capture or destroy the oil
> and gas when the ice has retreated.  Is this the kind of thing that the
> industry is thinking about?
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>
> ---
>
> On 21/06/2011 09:07, P. Wadhams wrote:
>>
>> Dear John, Generally the assumption is that if there is an under-ice
>> blowout, oil and gas will come out together, with the oil droplets coating
>> the gas bubbles and being carried up by them. So the result is a bubble
>> plume carrying oil up to the surface. Industry and government people
>> concerned with coping with this emphasise the importance of the oil as a
>> pollutant, and treat the gas as either something that can be allowed to
>> escape from the surface, or something that can be ignited. There is no
>> specific programme to deal with a gas leak as such, Best wishes Peter
>>
>> On Jun 21 2011, John Nissen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dear Peter,
>>>
>>> This [1] could be relevant to your workshop on oil under sea ice, late
>>> September in Italy.
>>>
>>> Does anybody know how they'd deal with major gas (methane) leak when
>>> drilling in the Arctic?  This would be relevant to our "methane busting"
>>> workshop, London, 3-4 September, where we will brainstorm on methods to
>>> prevent potentially huge quantities of Arctic methane reaching the
>>> atmosphere.   Who is an expert on gas leaks, that we could invite?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> [1] http://planetark.org/wen/62377
>>>
>>> A major offshore Arctic oil spill could severely challenge the Coast
>>> Guard, with no available infrastructure to base rescue and clean-up
>>> operations, the Coast Guard commandant said on Monday.
>>>
>>> "There is nothing up there to operate from at present and we're really
>>> starting from ground zero," said Adm. Robert Papp Jr. "Now's the time to be
>>> not just talking about it, but acting about it."
>>>
>>> Several major oil companies, notably Royal Dutch Shell, have acquired
>>> leases to drill in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas off Alaska. Arctic waters
>>> are likely to be accessible to humans for longer periods as the planet heats
>>> up.
>>>
>>> In May, the extent of Arctic ice was the third-smallest since satellites
>>> began collecting data in 1979, according to the U.S. National Snow and Ice
>>> Data Center.
>>>
>>> Noting that the Coast Guard sent 3,000 people to work on the 2010 BP oil
>>> spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Papp told reporters at a government symposium
>>> on shrinking Arctic ice: "No way we could deploy several thousand people as
>>> we did in the Deepwater Horizon spill."
>>>
>>> The Coast Guard has no helicopters based on Alaska's North Slope, and no
>>> U.S. agency has a helicopter there equipped to perform rescues at sea, he
>>> said. There are no facilities that could serve as temporary hangars for
>>> equipment, or any small boat facilities.
>>>
>>> Housing for any emergency workers amounts to a few dozen hotel rooms, he
>>> said.
>>>
>>> LIQUID FUEL TURNS TO GEL
>>>
>>> Even as the Arctic warms -- and it is warming faster than lower latitudes
>>> -- temperatures are still extremely cold, which means equipment built for
>>> operations in temperate zones need to be tested for fitness in the far
>>> north.
>>>
>>> For example, the Coast Guard flew a basic military cargo plane, the
>>> C-130, in the Arctic and found that the craft's liquid fuel turned into a
>>> gel when temperatures dipped below a certain level unless heaters were
>>> applied to it, Papp said.
>>>
>>> Only one U.S. icebreaker ship will be under way this year, he said.
>>> Another is being decommissioned and a third ship is being updated. Papp said
>>> China is building what will be the most powerful conventional icebreaker in
>>> the world.
>>>
>>> He praised the signing last month of the Arctic Search and Rescue
>>> Agreement, where eight Arctic nations -- Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland,
>>> Norway, Russia, Sweden and the United States -- agreed to cooperate on
>>> rescues above the Arctic Circle.
>>>
>>> The United States also needs to ratify the Law of the Sea treaty, Papp
>>> said. He said other Arctic nations are using this pact to stake claims to
>>> swaths of the extended continental shelf in the Arctic, and that U.S.
>>> ratification would enable the United States to extend its sovereignty there
>>> as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to