John
The design of gas catching equipment is strongly affected by coverage
area and flow rate. I have been looking at slow gas seepage over large
areas, say a 50 by 150 metre rectangle . I can transport and deploy
something that is compact for transport but can be spread out on the sea
bed to form something like a distorted parachute. The volume of gas
we can store underwater is small.
The words 'blow out' imply something much smaller but with much higher
flows and pressures and the design would be very different. I think
that we may need quite a wide range of quite distinct bits of
equipment. We also need to understand source areas and flow rates that
are likely to be encountered.
I do like the idea of letting the ice do the structural work but I have
seen film of quite rough ice undersides and lots of breaks.
Stephen.
Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design
Institute for Energy Systems
School of Engineering
Mayfield Road
University of Edinburgh EH9 3JL
Scotland
Tel +44 131 650 5704
Mobile 07795 203 195
www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs
On 21/06/2011 11:39, John Nissen wrote:
Dear Peter,
Thanks for your reply. Stephen has suggested a means of capturing
methane, which would catch the oil as well, using a large area of
plastic membrane held down at its edges by weighted tyres (or
something just heavier than water). It wouldn't solve the general
problem of natural blow-out, e.g. in ESAS, which concerns Shakhova et
al. (2008) [1], because you would not know in advance where the
blow-out might take place; but it could solve the problem when there
is drilling on a particular site - so the blow-out is restricted to a
limited, known area (less than say 1 km-2). The membrane would be
submerged and held over the danger area (anchored by the weights) when
the sea ice has retreated. In a blow-out, the gas would push the
membrane up to the surface - under the ice if there is ice - with the
weights still holding down the edges. So you'd get something looking
like an underwater hot-air balloon! You could then capture or destroy
the oil and gas when the ice has retreated. Is this the kind of thing
that the industry is thinking about?
Cheers,
John
---
On 21/06/2011 09:07, P. Wadhams wrote:
Dear John, Generally the assumption is that if there is an under-ice
blowout, oil and gas will come out together, with the oil droplets
coating the gas bubbles and being carried up by them. So the result
is a bubble plume carrying oil up to the surface. Industry and
government people concerned with coping with this emphasise the
importance of the oil as a pollutant, and treat the gas as either
something that can be allowed to escape from the surface, or
something that can be ignited. There is no specific programme to deal
with a gas leak as such, Best wishes Peter
On Jun 21 2011, John Nissen wrote:
Dear Peter,
This [1] could be relevant to your workshop on oil under sea ice,
late September in Italy.
Does anybody know how they'd deal with major gas (methane) leak when
drilling in the Arctic? This would be relevant to our "methane
busting" workshop, London, 3-4 September, where we will brainstorm
on methods to prevent potentially huge quantities of Arctic methane
reaching the atmosphere. Who is an expert on gas leaks, that we
could invite?
Cheers,
John
---
[1] http://planetark.org/wen/62377
A major offshore Arctic oil spill could severely challenge the Coast
Guard, with no available infrastructure to base rescue and clean-up
operations, the Coast Guard commandant said on Monday.
"There is nothing up there to operate from at present and we're
really starting from ground zero," said Adm. Robert Papp Jr. "Now's
the time to be not just talking about it, but acting about it."
Several major oil companies, notably Royal Dutch Shell, have
acquired leases to drill in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas off
Alaska. Arctic waters are likely to be accessible to humans for
longer periods as the planet heats up.
In May, the extent of Arctic ice was the third-smallest since
satellites began collecting data in 1979, according to the U.S.
National Snow and Ice Data Center.
Noting that the Coast Guard sent 3,000 people to work on the 2010 BP
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Papp told reporters at a government
symposium on shrinking Arctic ice: "No way we could deploy several
thousand people as we did in the Deepwater Horizon spill."
The Coast Guard has no helicopters based on Alaska's North Slope,
and no U.S. agency has a helicopter there equipped to perform
rescues at sea, he said. There are no facilities that could serve as
temporary hangars for equipment, or any small boat facilities.
Housing for any emergency workers amounts to a few dozen hotel
rooms, he said.
LIQUID FUEL TURNS TO GEL
Even as the Arctic warms -- and it is warming faster than lower
latitudes -- temperatures are still extremely cold, which means
equipment built for operations in temperate zones need to be tested
for fitness in the far north.
For example, the Coast Guard flew a basic military cargo plane, the
C-130, in the Arctic and found that the craft's liquid fuel turned
into a gel when temperatures dipped below a certain level unless
heaters were applied to it, Papp said.
Only one U.S. icebreaker ship will be under way this year, he said.
Another is being decommissioned and a third ship is being updated.
Papp said China is building what will be the most powerful
conventional icebreaker in the world.
He praised the signing last month of the Arctic Search and Rescue
Agreement, where eight Arctic nations -- Canada, Denmark, Finland,
Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden and the United States -- agreed to
cooperate on rescues above the Arctic Circle.
The United States also needs to ratify the Law of the Sea treaty,
Papp said. He said other Arctic nations are using this pact to stake
claims to swaths of the extended continental shelf in the Arctic,
and that U.S. ratification would enable the United States to extend
its sovereignty there as well.
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
