Monbiot's real mistake here is to swallow the conclusion of the Royal
Society report on the subject, whole and undigested, without critical
scrutiny or attention to other sources of information - in particular
as regards the weathering of magnesium silicate (not enough Ca
silicate to bother with):

Monbiot reports: "Dumping lime or calcium or magnesium silicates into
the sea, where they react with carbon dioxide. Fairly safe. Effective.
Expensive. Has
the advantage of potentially reversing ocean acidification, but the
amount of quarrying required to produce enough ground-up rock is
likely to be prohibitive. "

A) where does he get the idea that it's about dumping it in the sea?
It is about spreading the rock powder on land, and in intertidal
zones.
B) So it's "fairly safe". Why only "fairly"? This is just to
accelerate a natural process that is going on all the time anyway.
C) "Expensive" - how much? People who have done the sums
conservatively estimate $10-15 per tCO2. Making it one of the cheapest
options around.
D) It will only "potentially" reverse ocean acidification. Well,
insofar as the science of chemistry "potentially" applies. He seems to
be implying that maybe chemistry is "potentially" all wrong. George,
tell us more!
D) The amount of quarry is "likely to be prohibitive" - is it? Has he
done the sums? Has he asked anyone who has done the sums? Or is this
just his uniformed guess? For a start there are Gt of already mined
rock that can be used, in mine tailings around the world. From then
on, roughly 1t of rock sequesters 1t of CO2. So you need to mine an
amount of rock comparable to the amount of fossil fuel we are burning.
If it's not "prohibitive" to mine the coal, why's it "prohibitive" to
mine the rock?

Oliver Tickell.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to