I've added a post about the report, with adapted image, at the geo-engineering blog at: http://geo-engineering.blogspot.com/2011/09/carbon-negative-technologies.html Let me know if you want anything changed, Duncan.
We need more studies like this. Hopefully, further studies will take into account the comments made by Ron, John and Oliver. A quick comment from me is that a narrow focus on carbon-dioxide removal could overlook some of the many benefits of biochar, such as reduced emissions of methane, nitrous oxide and soot when biomass is pyrolyzed. That's why it's important to present geo-engineering as part of a comprehensive policy framework, as done at: http://knol.google.com/k/towards-a-sustainable-economy Cheers! Sam Carana sam.car...@gmail.com On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Duncan McLaren wrote: > Group members may find my assessment of negative emissions > technologies (NETs) of interest. > > The full report runs to about 100 pages, and can be found at > https://sites.google.com/site/mclarenerc/research/negative-emissions-technologies > > A summary version written for Friends of the Earth (England, Wales and > NI) will be published online later today. > > The assessment covers a wide range of NETs, but not SRM techniques. It > considers capacity, cost, side effects, constraints, technical > readiness, accountability and more for about 30 options. > > I'd be delighted to get feedback and comments. > > regards > Duncan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
