Thank you; models may help to explain the issues but not the science. Only when you do an experiment for which you have predicted the results and the predictions hold true and you do it enough times so that you have no doubt achieved truth do you have a credible science. Until then it is interesting but you cannot predict with any certainty and if you cannot predict then what do you have?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Robock Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:32 PM To: geoengineering Subject: [geo] Climate sensitivity These two one-page articles are an excellent explanation of the issues: http://www.pages-igbp.org/download/docs/PAGES%20news%202012-1(10-11)_Climate %20sensitivity.pdf Alan [On sabbatical for current academic year. The best way to contact me is by email, [email protected], or at 732-881-1610 (cell).] Alan Robock, Professor II (Distinguished Professor) Editor, Reviews of Geophysics Director, Meteorology Undergraduate Program Associate Director, Center for Environmental Prediction Department of Environmental Sciences Phone: +1-732-932-9800 x6222 Rutgers University Fax: +1-732-932-8644 14 College Farm Road E-mail: [email protected] New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551 USA http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
