John,
Not sure what solar powered process you are talking out, but re CDR and OA, it 
is possible to generate carbon-negative H2 electrochemically using base 
minerals (limestone or silicates), seawater, and photovoltaic Vdc *. The 
neutralization of the acid normally produced at the anode of a seawater 
electrolysis cell (neutralization by the presence of base minerals) forces 
excess OH- to accumulate in the seawater, which rapidly reacts with air or 
ocean CO2 to form alkaline bicarbonates. Thus CDR is effected in seawater, and 
ocean acid is neutralize and/or the added alkalinity helps offset the effects 
of ocean acidification (by elevating carbonate saturation state). 

As for fuel, it would be most efficient (carbon- and thermodynamics-wise) to 
directly use the H2 that is produced at the cathode, but if you insist on 
clinging to hydrocarbons, yes there are schemes for making these from H2 and 
CO2. The hydrocarbon utilization route of course just keeps more C circulating 
in the atmosphere. Keep in mind that using fuel cells, H2 can be readily 
converted to electricity and pure H2O, the value of which would not be lost on 
your present (and wanabe) coastal desert dwellers. 

Given the global abundance of seawater, base minerals, photons, and silica (for 
photocells; or one could go the solar thermal - electricity route), the 
preceding should scale quite readily, with relatively small land footprint(esp 
small if one considered using offshore solar or wind). One little problem is 
the avoidance of Cl2 generation at the anode, but there have been 
demonstrations of O2-selective anodes and other schemes that could be relevant. 

Let me know when you are ready to save the world or at least terraform some 
coastal deserts ;-)

Regards,
Greg
*http://www.goldschmidt2011.org/abstracts/finalPDFs/1698.pdf
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es800366q

--- On Tue, 3/6/12, John Nissen
 <[email protected]> wrote:

From: John Nissen <[email protected]>
Subject: [geo] Rapid ocean acidification militates rapid CO2 removal (CDR)
To: "geoengineering" <[email protected]>
Cc: "John Nissen" <[email protected]>, "Peter R Carter" 
<[email protected]>, "Anthony Cook" <[email protected]>, "Ron Larson" 
<[email protected]>, "Sam Carana" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2012, 6:02 AM

[Resent with correction] Hi all, Is there an alternative to rapid CDR to reduce 
the atmospheric CO2 level 
and hence slow ocean acidification?  Acidification is progressing at the 

fastest rate for 300 million years, faster even than in the PETM [1], 
and spells catastrophe if not curbed over the next decade or two.I am supporter 
of biochar for CDR on a large scale.  But few people 

think biochar can be scaled enough to actually start reducing the 
atmospheric CO2 level in the face of CO2 emissions set to climb for 
decades.  So we need a combination of low to medium cost CDR schemes, 
capable of scaling to the very large.
 Yesterday I heard about a scheme for use of solar energy (e.g. in Sahara) to 
power the scrubbing of CO2 from the atmosphere and the production of hydrogen
from H2O.  The hydrogen would then be combined with the captured CO2 

to create a carbon-neutral hydrocarbon fuel, which could then be cheaply 
and efficiently piped to countries wanting a green energy source, e.g. 
for cars and electricity generation.  Apparently it's much cheaper and 

more efficient to pipe liquid fuel than transmit the equivalent electric 
power over the same distance. Cheers, John P.S. If hydrogen can be produced 
from H2O, could a hydroxyl byproduct be used for 

combination with scrubbed methane (CH4) to produce further 
carbon-neutral fuel?  Atmospheric methane levels are rising ominously. [1] 
http://planetark.org/wen/64838
 



-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected].

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].


For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to