http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v488/n7409/full/nature11299.html
________________________________________
Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the 
past 50 years

A. P. Ballantyne,        C. B. Alden,    J. B. Miller,   P. P. Tans      & J. 
W. C. White
AffiliationsContributionsCorresponding author
Nature 488, 70–72 (02 August 2012) doi:10.1038/nature11299
Received 06 October 2011 Accepted 06 June 2012 Published online 01 August 2012

One of the greatest sources of uncertainty for future climate predictions is 
the response of the global carbon cycle to climate change1. Although 
approximately one-half of total CO2 emissions is at present taken up by 
combined land and ocean carbon reservoirs2, models predict a decline in future 
carbon uptake by these reservoirs, resulting in a positive carbon–climate 
feedback3. Several recent studies suggest that rates of carbon uptake by the 
land4, 5, 6 and ocean7, 8, 9, 10 have remained constant or declined in recent 
decades. Other work, however, has called into question the reported decline11, 
12, 13. Here we use global-scale atmospheric CO2 measurements, CO2 emission 
inventories and their full range of uncertainties to calculate changes in 
global CO2 sources and sinks during the past 50 years. Our mass balance 
analysis shows that net global carbon uptake has increased significantly by 
about 0.05 billion tonnes of carbon per year and that global carbon uptake 
doubled, from 2.4 ± 0.8 to 5.0 ± 0.9 billion tonnes per year, between 1960 and 
2010. Therefore, it is very unlikely that both land and ocean carbon sinks have 
decreased on a global scale. Since 1959, approximately 350 billion tonnes of 
carbon have been emitted by humans to the atmosphere, of which about 55 per 
cent has moved into the land and oceans. Thus, identifying the mechanisms and 
locations responsible for increasing global carbon uptake remains a critical 
challenge in constraining the modern global carbon budget and predicting future 
carbon–climate interactions.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to