Here's the paper (that I posted here Aug 20):
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/nclimate1555.pdf
Don't see umbrellas mentioned in the paper, but our point was let's find what 
if 
any marine management options might be cost effective and safe in the face of 
rising CO2. Until then we do not advocate deploying any.  Aside from 
stabilizing 
air CO2, the current marine action mantra for the ocean is "let's measure and 
model the problem, test CO2 effects at small scales,  and use traditional 
conservation methods to maximize ecosystem resilience and adaptation". We 
thought that seemed a little naive and risky given the unconventional and 
unprecedented nature of the problem.  Anyway, if we can't save the whole 
planet, 
how about 70%? 

-Greg


----- Original Message ----
From: Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>
To: geoengineering <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, August 22, 2012 12:32:29 AM
Subject: [geo] Great barrier reef geoengineering scheme - press coverage of NCC 
paper

I can't find the paper for this, so here's a press report.

A

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/9487095/Underwater-umbrellas-should-be-used-to-protect-Great-Barrier-Reef-says-report.html


Underwater 'umbrellas' should be used to protect Great Barrier Reef says report
Australian scientists have proposed covering endangered coral reefs
with shade cloth as part of "last resort" measures to protect parts of
the iconic Great Barrier Reef.

The proposal, in a paper published today, also includes using
low-voltage electrical currents to stimulate coral growth and defend
against the worsening impact of heat stress.

The paper, in the journal Nature Climate Change, says the pace of
global warming is unparalleled in 300 million years and has led to
temperature rises of at least 2 degrees Celsius and a 60-per-cent
increase in surface ocean acidity over the past three centuries.

Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg of Queensland University, Australia,
writing with Greg Rau from the University of California and Elizabeth
McLeod from The Nature Conservancy, calls for "unconventional,
non-passive methods to conserve marine ecosystems".

"A much broader approach to marine management and mitigation options,
including shade cloth, electrical current and genetic engineering must
be seriously considered," the paper says. "The magnitude and rapidity
of these changes is likely to surpass the ability of numerous marine
species to adapt and survive."

The paper proposes a range of possible future options for ocean
management, including selective breeding and adding base minerals and
silicates to the water to neutralise acidity. The Barrier Reef
includes about 900 coral formations stretching along 1,600 miles off
Australia's east coast. Its coral formations and marine life attract
about 2 million visitors each year.
Related Articles

    Great Barrier Reef report dismissed
    04 Jun 2012

    Australia 'to create largest network of marine parks'
    14 Jun 2012

    Prehistoric fish discovered
    15 Jul 2010

The shade cloths proposed in the report would be anchored with ropes
and float on the water surface to protect the corals from sunlight. In
an experiment performed in Queensland several years ago, researchers
deployed 15-feet by 15-feet sheets of plastic mesh, similar to those
used by gardeners to protect vegetable patches.

Professor Hoegh-Guldberg told the Daily Telegraph the technique was
useful for protecting small patches of coral but would not “save the
Great Barrier Reef” as a whole.

“We are recommending looking at these technologies because at current
rate of warming we may need to use them in 20 over 30 years time,” he
said. “We should test them now and see which ones work. Shading is not
a strategy that can be used across hundreds of kilometres of the reef.
But it might - at a local level – be able to influence how many corals
die.”

Earlier Professor Hoegh-Guldberg told The Conversation website: "It's
unwise to assume we will be able to stabilise atmospheric carbon
dioxide at levels necessary to prevent ongoing damage to marine
ecosystems."

"In lieu of dealing with the core problem – increasing emissions of
greenhouse gases – these techniques and approaches could ultimately
represent the last resort."

A separate report by Australian scientists found climate change is
having a dramatic impact on the country's marine life and causing
tropical fish to turn up in the chilly southern waters around
Tasmania.

The report, released last week, says south-east Australia has become
"a global warming hot spot" and damage to coral reefs is becoming more
severe.

It says climate change has caused worsening ocean acidification and
coral bleaching as well as a southward migration of seaweeds,
phytoplankton, zooplankton and fish.

"There is now striking evidence of extensive southward movements of
tropical species in south-east Australia, declines in abundance of
many temperate species, and the first signs of the effect of ocean
acidification on marine species with shells," says the report, by 80
scientists and led by the national science body, CSIRO.

The report found sea surface temperatures had increased by one degree
centigrade over the last century and that the east coast of Tasmania
and parts of Western Australia had the highest increases.

"The rate of temperature rise in Australian waters has accelerated
since the mid-twentieth century; from 0.08 degrees/decade in 1910-2011
to 0.11 degrees/decade from 1950-2011," the report says. "Sea levels
are rising around Australia, with fastest rates currently in northern
Australia." Professor David Booth, a marine ecologist at the
University of Technology Sydney, said tropical fish have been shifting
towards Tasmania for 30 or 40 years but the flow has increased in the
past 10 years.

"In this case the rapidity of the change is probably fairly
unprecedented," he told ABC Radio.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to