For details see:

Akbari, H., Menon, S., and Rosenfeld, A. 2009. Global cooling: increasing 
world-wide urban albedos to offset CO2 
(Download)<https://sites.google.com/a/lbl.gov/cool-white-planet/papers/Akbarietal.GlobalCooling2009.pdf?attredirects=0>
. *Climatic Change*, 94, pp. 275-286. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9515-9

Akbari, H. and Rosenfeld, A. 2008. White roofs cool the world, directly 
offset CO2 and delay global warming 
(Download)<https://sites.google.com/a/lbl.gov/cool-white-planet/home/background-materials/documents/WhiteRoofsCoolWorld2pp.doc?attredirects=0>
. Heat Island Group at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. *Research 
Highlight*, Nov 10. 

Akbari, H., Menon, S., and Rosenfeld, A. 2008. Equivalent CO2 avoided by 
reflective roofs and pavements in California 
(Download).<http://coolcolors.lbl.gov/assets/docs/Papers/CaliforniaIsCooling06-2008-08-21_final_.pdf>
 A 
memo to Dr. Bart Croes (California Air Resources Board). Revised Oct 21

On Thursday, August 30, 2012 11:34:08 PM UTC-4, Russell Seitz wrote:
>
> "If you paint a quarter of all London rooftops white, you could 
> probably reduce heat wave temperatures by 10 degrees centigrade — so 
> lots of impact at very low cost. Let's think about that," said Danish 
> author and political scientist Dr Bjørn Lomberg,
>
> Since  roofs constitute  <25 % of greater london's area, a look at the 
> radiative forcing potential of the  relevant urban  statistics:
>
>
> http://livingroofs.org/20110502300/world-green-roof-policies/history-of-green-roofs-in-london.html
>
> Suggests Lomborg's estimate is too high by an order of magnitude or more.
>
> On Monday, August 27, 2012 5:44:51 AM UTC-4, andrewjlockley wrote:
>>
>> Geo-engineering: fixing climate for just US$6 billion 
>> Summary: What's the best way to deal with climate change? 
>>
>> Some engineers think that geo-engineering, or re-engineering the 
>> planet, is a far more cost-effective way of tackling climate change 
>> than market mechanisms, like emissions trading schemes or Australia's 
>> carbon tax. 
>>
>> One model suggests that a technique called "cloud brightening" could 
>> counter all of the 21st century's projected temperature rises, for a 
>> cost of just US$6 billion. To put that into perspective, that's around 
>> the price being paid for 24 F/A-18 Super Hornet jet fighters by the 
>> Royal Australian Air Force. 
>>
>> Whether that model is accurate or not, it's starting to become clear 
>> that market mechanisms and Kyoto-style negotiations won't be enough. 
>>
>> On this week's Patch Monday podcast, you'll hear from two enthusiasts 
>> for geo-engineering who spoke at the Centre for Independent Studies' 
>> recent "Consilium" conference. 
>>
>> "Even if we do reduce carbon emissions drastically, it's going to be a 
>> very long time before we see any of the effects of that, and it will 
>> be very costly and slow," said Dr Caspar Hewett, visiting researcher 
>> at the University of Newcastle in the UK. 
>>
>> "These other techniques that we're talking about are probably going to 
>> be necessary anyway, even if we do reduce carbon," he said. 
>>
>> The techniques include grand engineering schemes, such as artificial 
>> volcanoes that inject sulphur particles into the atmosphere to seed 
>> clouds, and even placing millions of smart mirrors into orbit around 
>> the earth, like a giant pergola. 
>>
>> But simple, small-scale techniques can also produce significant 
>> effects, such as planting trees and painting the rooftops of buildings 
>> white to reflect sunlight. 
>>
>> "If you paint a quarter of all London rooftops white, you could 
>> probably reduce heat wave temperatures by 10 degrees centigrade — so 
>> lots of impact at very low cost. Let's think about that," said Danish 
>> author and political scientist Dr Bjørn Lomberg, director of the 
>> Copenhagen Consensus Centre in Washington. 
>>
>> Needless to say, these schemes are controversial. Both Hewett and 
>> Lomberg are calling for large-scale experiments to validate the 
>> mathematical models. 
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/geoengineering/-/TVG94EnLDB0J.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to