Surely statements like this: > Economic cost concepts are likely to show that the cost of climate > engineering will be larger than currently perceived.
-- have no basis in fact. Having done some SRM cost estimates, like others I find it's quite small for regional experiments. That's yet another reason to pursue regional goals first. Gregory Benford -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
