Dear Geo group, I have noticed that much of the discussion on this topic are 
based on older papers.  Here is a recent one.
Williamson P., D. W.R. Wallace , C.S. Law, P.W. Boyd, Y. Collos, P. Croot, K. 
Denman, U. Riebesell, S. Takeda, C. Vivian (2012) Ocean fertilization for 
geoengineering: A review of effectiveness, environmental impacts and emerging 
governance.   Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 9, 475–488.
and also a link to a Theme Section on this topic from 2008
Implications of large-scale iron fertilization of the oceans
Idea: Howard Browman, Philip W. Boyd
Coordination: Philip W. Boyd

MEPS 364:213-309 | Complete Theme Section in pdf 
format<http://www.int-res.com/articles/theme/m364ThemeSection.pdf> (2 MB) 
[http://www.int-res.com/fileadmin/images/oa.jpg]



Philip

Professor Philip Boyd  FRSNZ
NIWA Centre of Chemical & Physical Oceanography
Department of Chemistry
University of Otago
Dunedin
New Zealand

03-479-5249

________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Ken Caldeira [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] "A Cheap and Easy Plan to Stop Global Warming" By David 
Rotman

A nicely done article.

I would like to expand on one of Ray Pierrehumbert's comments.

He is quoted as saying:

“The term ‘solar radiation management’ is positively Orwellian. It’s a way to 
increase comfort levels with this crazy idea.” —Raymond Pierrehumbert
He is right that it was created to inrease comfort level, but it was done so 
with ironic intent.

In 2007, I was organizing a meeting that took place at NASA-Ames.  
(Incidentally, that meeting is where this google group started. 
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20070031204)

There was some nervousness on the part of local NASA officials that the term 
"geoengineering" might raise red flags back in Washington.  At the time, DOE 
was talking about "carbon management" which was a bureaucratic way to speak 
about the potential for CO2 emissions reduction.

To avoid the use of the word "geoengineering" in the meeting name, I suggested 
that we create the term "Solar Radiation Managment" to use for the workshop. It 
was meant as parody of US-government-style bureaucratic jargon. It was meant as 
a joke and was intentionally obscurantist. We were laughing about it at the 
time and never dreamed that it would become standard jargon.

The term "Solar Radiation Management" was meant to lower the profile of the 
meeting while parodying Washington jargon. It amuses me that it has become 
standard jargon.

What started out as parody has moved on from its comedic roots.  Comedy has 
become drama.

Incidentally, lately I have been using the term "solar geoengineering" as my 
term of choice to refer to what SRM has come to denote.

Best,

Ken
_______________
Ken Caldeira

Carnegie Institution for Science
Dept of Global Ecology
260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
+1 650 704 7212 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab  @kencaldeira

Caldeira Lab is hiring postdoctoral researchers.
http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab/Caldeira_employment.html

Our YouTube videos<http://www.youtube.com/user/CarnegieGlobEcology/videos>


On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Simon Driscoll 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/511016/a-cheap-and-easy-plan-to-stop-global-warming/

Ray Pierrehumbert recently sent this to me, and I haven't seen this posted to 
the group (apologies if it has been and I missed it in a quick search), so I 
thought it may be of interest.

All the best,

Simon

________________________________________________

Simon Driscoll
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics
Department of Physics
University of Oxford

Office: 01865 272930
Mobile: 07935314940

http://www2.physics.ox.ac.uk/contacts/people/driscoll
http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/people/who-are-we/simon-driscoll/
http://80000hours.org/members/simon-driscoll

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:geoengineering%[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to