My take is at 
http://heliophage.wordpress.com/2013/03/31/climate-geoengineering-for-natural-disasters/

Extract: One implication is that climate geoengineering deployed in just 
the northern hemisphere looks like a very bad idea. Programmes in just the 
north have been considered and studied, in part because of the worries 
people have about something suddenly going wrong in the Arctic, something 
that needs “fixing” quickly. This research makes such approaches look 
dangerous.
More interesting, and more novel, is the implication that geoengineering 
might be used to avert a Sahelian drought caused by a volcano. If the 
stratospheric sulphates released in a major northern eruption were promptly 
countered by a deliberate release of sulphates into the southern 
hemisphere, both hemispheres would cool. The ITCZ would stay put, and a 
drought might well be averted. For a major drought, that would be a big 
win. The drought in the 1980s, which followed on the 1982 eruption of El 
Chichon in Mexico, killed about a quarter of a million people and turned 
millions more into refugees.
...
And if the Earth is left to its own devices, such droughts will happen 
again. Last century there were two eruptions that cooled the north and were 
followed by drought in the Sahel. The north is better endowed with 
volcanoes than the south, since the Pacific “ring of fire” is more a 
horseshoe of fire, with a gap in the south but a continuous arc in the 
north. The odds of at least one eruption in the Pinatubo-to-Krakatoa range 
somewhere of the Earth in this century are better than even. The chances of 
one happening in the north are obviously lower; but the odds are hardly 
long.
If humans had had the technological wherewithal to stop the 1980s Sahel 
drought in its tracks, would people have wanted to use it? It seems likely 
that there would have been a constituency for it, not least in the Sahel. 
And many of the reasons people have for objecting to geoengineering as an 
inappropriate “technical fix” to man-made climate change might apply with 
rather less force if the technology was being used to forestall a natural 
disaster on a continental scale.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to