http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/5891-China-s-geoengineering-plans-dismissed-as-fantasy-

China’s geoengineering plans dismissed as “fantasy”

Beth Walker

Olivia Boyd

The authorities are increasing their cloud-seeding ambitions in response to
drought, but many experts are sceptical about the benefitsChina has a long
history of "rainmaking", but experts are sharply divided on the merits.
(Image by baike.baidu.com) Airplanes loaded with cloud-seeding chemicals
swept across southwest China early last month in a bid to bring rain to the
drought-parched region. Tens of thousands of rockets and battalions of
cannons stood poised to ambush stray clouds that might pass unwittingly
into view.By mid March a light, sporadic drizzle over Yunnan
province brought welcome relief to farmers and residents struggling into a
fourth consecutive year of severe drought. Local newspapers heralded the
rains as the province’s first successful large scale cloud-seeding
operations of the year.This was the latest episode in China’s attempts to
control the weather. The water-starved country already has the world’s
largest weather engineering programmes, and these look set to grow. In
February, China’s top economic planner, the National Development and Reform
Commission, announced plans to step up cloud-seeding and other weather
modification techniques to tackle drought and boost
agriculture.Cloud-seeding is the oldest and most common weather
modification technology, and often a resort during drought. It involves
injecting clouds with frozen carbon dioxide (dry ice) or silver iodide,
using military aircraft, cannons or rockets, to speed up the production of
rain.China’s bid to use cloud-seeding to guarantee blue skies during the
2008 Beijing Olympics caught global attention. But the country’s history of
“rainmaking” stretches back into the distant past. Marco Polo reportedly
returned to Europe from Cathay with an “explosive yellow powder” – and
tales of how the Chinese used it to trigger rain, historian James R Fleming
points out in his book Fixing The Sky.Today, China spends US$100 million a
year on operations to make rain, prevent hailstorms, contribute to fire
fighting and counteract dust storms in almost every province.It’s a figure
expected to grow. "Weather modification technology is crucial to China,"
Zheng Guoguang, head of the China Meteorological Administration, told China
Daily in 2012. During China's 12th Five-Year plan period "our goal is to
reduce losses caused by weather disasters from 3% of GDP last year to 1% by
the end of the period."Doubts about effectivenessChina is not the only
country looking for technological fixes to water scarcity. The popularity
of cloud-seeding has rocketed over the past decade, as governments,
companies and scientists turn to large-scale interventions in our climate
systems – known as geoengineering – as a potential fix for water shortages
and global warming.In the US, cloud-seeding is used to boost rainfall
during spring planting, suppress hail, increase snowpack in the Rocky
Mountains and divert and weaken hurricanes. Scientists working for the Abu
Dhabi government claimed to have created more than 50 rainstorms in Al Ain
in July and August of 2010, the peak of summer. Indonesia recently said it
had used cloud-seeding to prevent further flooding in its inundated capital
Jakarta. Iraq, Yemen, India and Mexico all have their own
programmes.“Worldwide more than 40 or 50 countries are doing
cloud-seeding,” says Roelof Bruintjes one of the world's leading experts on
weather modification at the US National Center for Atmospheric Researchwho
has helped many countries design and improve weather modification
programmes, including China.“With so many countries doing this, getting the
science right is important.”China’s false hopes on geoengineeringThough a
prominent advocate of weather modification, Bruintjes is critical of
China’s methods. Despite the wishful thinking of policymakers,
cloud-seeding is “not a drought busting tool”, he says, pointing out that
drought tends to mean less cloud – and without cloud, you can’t cloud-seed.
Such techniques should be used as a long-term water management tool rather
than a quick fix, he says.Paul Sayers, a water expert at the University of
Oxford who is advising the Chinese government on drought planning, also
dismisses cloud-seeding as a solution to drought, arguing the authorities
need to get a better balance between supply and demand management. “Drought
plans can’t just be about infrastructure – desalination, cloud-seeding –
China needs to think about drought in a more strategic way.” A start would
be to find a way of prioritising water allocations during drought to avoid
irreversible environmental damage, he says.Experts are in fact sharply
divided on the efficacy of cloud-seeding. The China Meteorological
Administration claims its weather manipulations helped to release 490
billion tonnes of rain – about 12 times the water storage of the Three
Gorges Project – between 2002 and 2012. But many are sceptical about such
lofty claims, as well as China’s recent noises about more ambitious
programmes.“My first impression is that it’s very much more of a public
relations effort than it might be a technically sound proposition,” says
Fleming, who is professor of science, technology and society at Colby
University in Maine. Being seen to do something about China’s worsening
drought at least demonstrates an attempt to fix the problem, even if it
achieves little.As the world invests more in geoengineering, China is also
likely to want to stay at the front of the pack, he says: “If China is
becoming a world leader economically and in some ways militarily, they’re
going to have to position themselves as a player in this field, even if
from my point of view it’s a slight fantasy.”Does it work?The danger,
Fleming argues, is that a focus on weather manipulation distracts from the
lifestyle changes that can really make a difference to our environment. The
biggest impact on the Beijing Olympics came not from the much-hyped
“cocktail of artillery shell ordinance” used to bust up clouds, he says,
but lower-key measures to slow down traffic into the city, which reduced
hydrocarbons and helped clear the air, compounded by a “fortuitous weather
pattern”.This gets to the heart of the problem with evaluating
cloud-seeding, namely the difficulty proving cause and effect. Weather is
complex, shifting and difficult to understand – crediting shell fire for
subsequent rain is easy enough in political rhetoric, but harder to stand
up scientifically.Some of the research that has been done strikes a
sceptical tone. In 2003, the US National Research Council published a study
that questioned the effectiveness of cloud-seeding and the extent of
impacts outside of local areas. The report called for greater research into
practices for understanding and improving cloud-seeding impacts.To
complicate things further, rising levels of pollution in the atmosphere
could reduce the effectiveness of cloud-seeding, says Bruintjes. His
research on inadvertent weather modification, including the effects of
smoke and pollution on clouds and rainfall, suggests that what works in an
unpolluted region may not in a highly polluted one.He says more research is
urgently needed in China, where the approach has been chaotic and
unscientific:“They have made some claims but there is no evaluation
available that can substantiate their claims," he says. China has started
to invest more in upgrading technology and evaluation methods, adds
Bruintjes, but results will be slow to show.Research is costly, admits
Bruintjes, but if you can get 10-15% of water out of cloud, it’s
cost-effective – “five to 15 times cheaper” than any water-saving
alternative, such as building reservoirs, desalination plants or
water-transfer programmes.Fears of local and regional conflictConcerns
stretch beyond efficacy and cost, however. Fleming points out that commerce
is playing a driving role in weather modification. His studies of dry areas
of the US show funding for rainfall enhancement is coming not from the
government, but from water companies, irrigation companies and hydropower
companies.Officials in China have also talked about providing cloud-seeding
as a service to the private sector. The prospect of companies paying for
rain to fall in one area – potentially meaning it won’t fall somewhere else
– will inevitably raise knotty questions about water rights and public
access to resources.Some commentators are also fearful that growing use of
weather modification could lead to conflict both within and between
states.Its development is already closely linked with military espionage.
During the Cold War, US scientists debated weather modification as one way
to destroy Soviet agricultural harvests and incite internal dissent. The US
military used cloud-seeding in the Vietnam War to disrupt transport of
military supplies along the Ho Chi Minh, a move it's claimed triggered
catastrophic flooding and widespread starvation.James Lee, professor at the
American University, Washington and author of Climate Change and Armed
Conflict, has even suggested the US military is investing in cloud-seeding
as an excuse for developing drones. Almost inevitably, Lee fears the
widespread use of weather modification could trigger resource conflicts:
“There are so many countries involved in this that I think at some time,
one country is going to say to the other ‘hey, you’re stealing our rain’.”

主题 TOPICS

Climate change & Energy

Water

Security

作者 AUTHOR

Beth Walker

Beth Walker is UK editor of chinadialogue's thethirdpole.net.

SUBSCRIBE TO ARTICLES FROM AUTHOR

english

Olivia Boyd

Olivia Boyd is a journalist and editor based in London. Her work has
appeared in publications including China's Southern Weekend, The Ecologist
and Building magazine, where she was formerly senior reporter. Olivia
studied Chinese at Oxford University. You can follow her on Twitter at
@oliviaboydemail: [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to