The second word in the second sentence should have been "warming".

On Monday, May 27, 2013 5:24:24 PM UTC+2, Ninad Bondre wrote:
>
> Measures that tackle air pollution have led to well-documented, largely 
> positive health outcomes that need not be repeated here. That cooling is an 
> "unintended consequence" of such measures is hardly news: that is why 
> several recent endeavours have called for tackling air pollution and 
> climate in an integrated fashion (e.g. 
> http://www.igacproject.org/sites/all/themes/bluemasters/images/IGBP_IGAC_AirPolClim_Statement_FINAL.pdf
> ).
>
> Are members of this group considering researching aerosol removal to 
> intentionally warm the climate? Any current research or proposed research 
> projects aimed at tackling climate change by engaging in climate warming? 
> Do update the group if that is the case. Then we can have a meaningful 
> conversation about that "extensive, un-announced , un-reviewed and 
> un-regulated a climate intervention".
>
>
> On Monday, May 27, 2013 5:53:14 AM UTC+2, Ken Caldeira wrote:
>>
>>
>> Why aren't ETC and the Chemtrail nutters up in arms about this?
>>
>> They would rather focus on the hypothetical and the fantastical than 
>> focus on the climate change that modern society is today knowingly causing.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Russell Seitz <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> So extensive, un-announced , un-reviewed and un-regulated a climate 
>>> intervention must surely contravene the London Convention!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, May 25, 2013 12:12:18 PM UTC-4, Ken Caldeira wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.sciencedirect.com/**science/article/pii/**S1352231011007722<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722>
>>>>
>>>>   Atmospheric 
>>>> Environment<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13522310>
>>>>
>>>> Volume 
>>>> 46<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13522310/46/supp/C>, 
>>>> January 2012, Pages 545–553
>>>> [image: Cover 
>>>> image]<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13522310/46/supp/C>
>>>>  Regional warming from aerosol removal over the United States: Results 
>>>> from a transient 2010–2050 climate simulation
>>>>    
>>>>    - L.J. 
>>>> Mickley<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#>
>>>>    
>>>> a<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#aff1>
>>>>    , [image: Corresponding author contact 
>>>> information]<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#cor1>
>>>>    , [image: E-mail the corresponding author],  
>>>>    - E.M. 
>>>> Leibensperger<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#>
>>>>    
>>>> a<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#aff1>
>>>>    , 
>>>> b<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#aff2>
>>>>    ,  
>>>>    - D.J. 
>>>> Jacob<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#>
>>>>    
>>>> a<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#aff1>
>>>>    ,  
>>>>    - D. 
>>>> Rind<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#>
>>>>    
>>>> c<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011007722#aff3> 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We find that
>>>> removing U.S. aerosol significantly enhances the warming from greenhouse 
>>>> gases in a spatial pattern that
>>>> strongly correlates with that of the aerosol. Warming is nearly 
>>>> negligible outside the United States, but
>>>> annual mean surface temperatures increase by 0.4 - 0.6 K in the eastern 
>>>> United States
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This article suggests that "inadvertent regional geoengineering" is 
>>>> already cooling the US by about 0.5 C in the eastern US.  Note that they 
>>>> find little effect outside of the "geoengineered" region.  
>>>>
>>>> (This came out last year but I missed it then.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________
>>>> Ken Caldeira
>>>>
>>>> Carnegie Institution for Science 
>>>> Dept of Global Ecology
>>>> 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
>>>> +1 650 704 7212 kcal...@**carnegiescience.edu
>>>> http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/**caldeiralab<http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab>
>>>>   
>>>> @kencaldeira
>>>>
>>>> *Caldeira Lab is hiring postdoctoral researchers.*
>>>> *http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab/Caldeira_employment.html*
>>>>
>>>> Check out the profile of me on NPR's All Things 
>>>> Considered<http://www.npr.org/2013/04/22/176344300/this-scientist-aims-high-to-save-the-worlds-coral-reefs>
>>>>  
>>>  -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "geoengineering" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to