Alan: 

I agree that the report was balanced, if the criterion is knowledge in 2008 - 
the earliest date on the LLNL figure. To give ocean fertilization as the only 
example of CDR is not being very investigative or "balanced". 

I have the same complaint about the "CIA" study behind the NPR piece, which is 
also only looking at "examples" - with a trivial budget. Almost guaranteed to 
miss the most likely winners. 

Ron 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Robock" <[email protected]> 
To: "Geoengineering" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 4:00:41 PM 
Subject: [geo] Geoengineering piece on Aspen Public Radio 

Another short piece on geoengineering, interviewing several people 
involved. It is quite balanced, as you would expect from Public Radio. 

http://aspenpublicradio.org/post/geoengineering-technological-fix-climate-change
 

Alan Robock 

Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor 
Editor, Reviews of Geophysics 
Director, Meteorology Undergraduate Program 
Associate Director, Center for Environmental Prediction 
Department of Environmental Sciences Phone: +1-848-932-5751 
Rutgers University Fax: +1-732-932-8644 
14 College Farm Road E-mail: [email protected] 
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551 USA http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock 
http://twitter.com/AlanRobock 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected]. 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to