We spend a lot of time discussing the merits of individual approaches to geoengineering and arguing for prioritizing one or the other.
Assuming hypothetically that 1) all methods, all flavors of SRM/CDR are "approved" by a governance authority 2) all methods, all flavors are assigned values for "years to deployment" and "RF per year" and "cost per unit of RF" has anyone done an exercise modeling the optimum mix across all methods/all flavors? if some methods/flavors are disapproved? if values are modified? --- Fred Zimmerman Geoengineering IT! Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
