Fred John Shepherd (cc) did a graphical analysis of this issue, which I found very helpful.
I've cc'd him, and maybe he can provide the graph. A On Sep 24, 2013 2:54 PM, "Fred Zimmerman" <[email protected]> wrote: > We spend a lot of time discussing the merits of individual approaches to > geoengineering and arguing for prioritizing one or the other. > > Assuming hypothetically that > > 1) all methods, all flavors of SRM/CDR are "approved" by a governance > authority > 2) all methods, all flavors are assigned values for "years to deployment" > and "RF per year" and "cost per unit of RF" > > has anyone done an exercise modeling the optimum mix across all > methods/all flavors? if some methods/flavors are disapproved? if values > are modified? > > > --- > Fred Zimmerman > Geoengineering IT! > Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology > GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
