Andrew and list:
I agree the Oxford group is doing good work. But it is incorrect to claim
"virtually every" as regards biochar, where they show 26 papers (not all
peer-reviewed). By my reckoning they have missed 400+ biochar research papers
since their most recent entry from February last year. Maybe they should keep
what they have, but they should also send readers to a fully searchable biochar
data base:
http://www.biochar-international.org/biblio
They are leaving an inaccurate perception of the state of the biochar
literature portion of the CDR part of Geoengineering. Have they done the same
for any others?
Ron
On Oct 12, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/geolibrary/index/
>
> This has been posted before, but it's amazing, so I'm bumping it. It's the
> Oxford Martin school geoengineering research library. Virtually every
> geoengineering research document is indexed.
>
> A
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
