Bruce and list My impression(quick skim only) is that the May White House document http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/nat_arctic_strategy.pdf doesn’t say anything definitive. True?
Ron On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:08 PM, French, Bruce <bruce.fre...@yorkrsg.com> wrote: > US Military Responds To Arctic Ocean Melting: Polar Ice Melting Prompts US > Military To Protect New Waterways [Maps] > By David Kashi > on January 13 2014 11:07 AM > > http://www.ibtimes.com/us-military-responds-arctic-ocean-melting-polar-ice-melting-prompts-us-military-protect-new-1536942 > > > It is safe to assume that investors in polar resource exploitation can be > expected to resist any future geoengineering efforts. > > Bruce > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email togeoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
