Greg etal

   Because this paper is behind a paywall,  I can barely glean from their 
figures that they may be looking at a fifty year time horizon.  Did they look 
at all at either SRM or CDR when using the term “irreversibility?  (quotes in 
the original - why?)

Ron


On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Greg Rau <[email protected]> wrote:

> http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/01/13-2
> Antarctic Glacier's 'Irreversible' Melting Threatens 'Considerable Increase' 
> to Sea Level Rise
> New study on Pine Island Glacier shows 'striking vision of the near future,' 
> says co-author
> - Andrea Germanos, staff writer
> An Antarctic glacier is melting "irreversibly," offering "a striking vision 
> of the near future," a new study shows.
> The study published Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change looked at 
> Pine Island Glacier, the largest single contributor to sea-level rise in the 
> Antarctic.
> The team of scientists used three ice flow models to look at the glacier's 
> grounding line, which separates the grounded ice sheet from the floating ice 
> shelf.
> The grounding line, which has already retreated by about 10 kilometers in the 
> last decade, "is probably engaged in an unstable 40  kilometer retreat," the 
> study finds.
> The glacier "has started a phase of self-sustained retreat and will 
> irreversibly continue its decline," said Gael Durand, a glaciologist with 
> France's Grenoble Alps University and study co-author.
> Durand says the findings show "a striking vision of the near future. All the 
> models suggest that [the glacier's] recession will not stop, cannot be 
> reversed and that more ice will be transferred into the ocean.”
> Agence France-Presse adds:
> A massive river of ice, the glacier by itself is responsible for 20 per cent 
> of total ice loss from the West Antarctic Ice Sheet today.
> On average, it shed 20 billion tonnes of ice annually from 1992-2011, a loss 
> that is likely to increase up to and above 100 billion tonnes each year, said 
> the study.
> "The Pine Island Glacier shows the biggest changes in this area at the 
> moment, but if it is unstable it may have implications for the entire West 
> Antarctic Ice Sheet," Planet Earth Online reports study co-author G. Hilmar 
> Gudmundsson from the National Environment Research Council's British 
> Antarctic Survey as saying.
> "Currently we see around two millimeters of sea level rise a year, and the 
> Pine Island Glacier retreat could contribute an additional 3.5 - 5 
> millimeters in the next twenty years, so it would lead to a considerable 
> increase from this area alone. But the potential is much larger," Gudmundsson 
> warned.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  • [geo] Case... Geoengineering Our Climate (eds. Blackstock, Miller and Rayner)
    • Re: [... Ronal W. Larson
      • R... Greg Rau
        • ... Greg Rau
          • ... Ronal W. Larson
            • ... Keith Henson
              • ... Ronal W. Larson
                • ... Ronal W. Larson
                • ... Keith Henson
                • ... Ronal W. Larson
                • ... Andrew Lockley
                • ... Doug MacMartin
                • ... Peter Flynn
                • ... Andrew Lockley
                • ... Keith Henson

Reply via email to