I think this got on geo last year, but worth repeating. Interesting how $900M/yr can be strategically invested to preserve $70T in BAU, good ROI. Further recent evidence of the reach and scope of this movement is seen here: http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/197001-efforts-to-cap-co2-emissions-are-adverse-to-human Anyway, I'm afraid it's going to take more than $900M/yr invested in the opposite direction to change this. Other ideas?
Greg >________________________________ > From: Stephen Salter <[email protected]> >To: geoengineering <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 7:29 AM >Subject: [geo] miseries. > > >Hi All > >For extra depression read > >http://www.drexel.edu/~/media/Files/now/pdfs/Institutionalizing%20Delay%20-%20Climatic%20Change.ashx > >Stephen >-- Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design School of Engineering University >of Edinburgh Mayfield Road Edinburgh EH9 3JL Scotland [email protected] Tel >+44 (0)131 650 5704 Cell 07795 203 195 WWW.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs > >The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in >Scotland, with registration number SC005336. > >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"geoengineering" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >email to [email protected]. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
