What qualifies as "DAC CDR"?

Greg
________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on 
behalf of Fred Zimmerman [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 7:02 PM
To: Mark Capron
Cc: [email protected]; geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Re: what's new on cost estimates for DAC CDR?

There are summaries of cost estimates in several of the articles referenced in 
this thread. There are values reported at pretty much every stop between $45 
and $1000/ton.  I am not sure that I find any of the estimates convincing as 
yet.  I wonder if the size of global demand (whether industrial or 
governmental) is a bigger problem than cost.


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:56 PM, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Charlie,

You mean a table or something like an updated McLaren 
chart<http://http://oceanforesters.org/References.html>, 
http://oceanforesters.org/References.html.  The chart is at the bottom of the 
page.  Duncan McLaren has produced this chart for a few years.  His "2012 A 
comparative assessment..." (link near top of the same page) was published in 
the same journal with "Negative carbon via Ocean Afforestation."

Mark E. Capron, PE
Ventura, California
www.PODenergy.org<http://www.PODenergy.org>


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [geo] Re: what's new on cost estimates for DAC CDR?
From: Charlie Zender <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thu, August 28, 2014 1:51 pm
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Fred,

It would be a great contribution if you synthsized your review into a table of 
DAC CDR cost estimates which we could all view.

Best,
Charlie

On Monday, August 25, 2014 10:17:58 PM UTC-7, Fred Zimmerman wrote:
Hi --

I am updating a literature review on cost estimates for DAC CDR and I am 
wondering what has changed both empirically and analytically since the flurry 
of papers in 2011-2013 with APS, House, Keith, Lackner et al.


Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
"a fox, not a hedgehog" -- Isaiah Berlin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to