Mechanical / chemical engineering processes, eg as per Keith, Lackner, etc.
A On 30 Aug 2014 18:37, "Rau, Greg" <[email protected]> wrote: > What qualifies as "DAC CDR"? > > Greg > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [[email protected]] > on behalf of Fred Zimmerman [[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 7:02 PM > *To:* Mark Capron > *Cc:* [email protected]; geoengineering > *Subject:* Re: [geo] Re: what's new on cost estimates for DAC CDR? > > There are summaries of cost estimates in several of the articles > referenced in this thread. There are values reported at pretty much every > stop between $45 and $1000/ton. I am not sure that I find any of the > estimates convincing as yet. I wonder if the size of global demand > (whether industrial or governmental) is a bigger problem than cost. > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:56 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Charlie, >> >> You mean a table or something like an updated McLaren chart >> <http://http://oceanforesters.org/References.html>, >> http://oceanforesters.org/References.html. The chart is at the bottom >> of the page. Duncan McLaren has produced this chart for a few years. His >> "2012 A comparative assessment..." (link near top of the same page) was >> published in the same journal with "Negative carbon via Ocean >> Afforestation." >> >> Mark E. Capron, PE >> Ventura, California >> www.PODenergy.org >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [geo] Re: what's new on cost estimates for DAC CDR? >> From: Charlie Zender <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, August 28, 2014 1:51 pm >> To: [email protected] >> >> Fred, >> >> It would be a great contribution if you synthsized your review into a >> table of DAC CDR cost estimates which we could all view. >> >> Best, >> Charlie >> >> On Monday, August 25, 2014 10:17:58 PM UTC-7, Fred Zimmerman wrote: >>> >>> Hi -- >>> >>> I am updating a literature review on cost estimates for DAC CDR and I >>> am wondering what has changed both empirically and analytically since the >>> flurry of papers in 2011-2013 with APS, House, Keith, Lackner et al. >>> >>> >>> Fred Zimmerman >>> Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA >>> "a fox, not a hedgehog" -- Isaiah Berlin >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "geoengineering" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
