If there is anything easier than finding many gigatons of olivine (the rock 
dunite has BY DEFINTION more than 90% olivine, and the remainder is mostly 
pyroxene that also weathers, but not as fast) which is found in many countries 
on all continents in large massives near the surface, permitting open pit 
mining. The negative sounds are echoing the negative and unjust qualifications 
that have always been issued by the CCS-boys, Olaf Schuiling

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Stuart Haszeldine
Sent: vrijdag 17 oktober 2014 20:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: [geo] Re: Storing greenhouse gas underground--for a million years | 
Science/AAAS | News

Oliver, Olaf,

I think that you should read the scientific evidence rebuttals of the Weyburn 
allegations, not the newspaper feeds.  Its VERY clear that geochemical 
fingerprinting of the CO2 at the Kerr farm near Weyburn is SOIL CO2 of totally 
normal origin.  Nothing to do with the deep  below ground oil extraction 
operation, where the CAPTURED  CO2 has distinct isotope compositions and 
different trace gas fingerprints. The deep injected CO2 is also overwhelmingly 
dissolved in the deep groundwater at Weyburn so it cannot leak.  Try this from 
a newspaper   
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/international-team-of-scientists-conclude-no-carbon-dioxide-co2-leaked-on-kerr-farm-135439598.html
Or this from the scientific report  
http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/sgilfil1/Kerrreport.pdf

On the real topic of this post, the work by Hesse shows beyond any reasonable 
doubt that CO2 is securely stored for millions of years.  This was also clear 
from Italy - where the risk of death from leakage is tiny 1 in 35 million per 
year.  Try driving a car with many many tens more risk than that.

On Olafs (usual) point - yes olivine weathering will absorb CO2.  But do the 
numbers - olivine is low cost at start, butto make any impact on total 
Gigatonnes of CO2, the world needs to mine out most of Oman - so it gets more 
expensive.  And there are plenty of by-products because its very hard to find 
Gigatonnes of pure olivine.

All these remedies have a role, its not either or, as the world looks like its 
so far past sustainable already.

But, no point in discarding CCS for the paltry cost of a few extra dollars a 
year at the start.

ALL of the above does work - because so little has started.
The lowest cost of all is insulation, efficiency and demand reduction.
Take one less train or airplane.
But, we low from at least 30 years experience - that doesn't happen.

My solution - taxing carbon extraction at source. Not taxing the users.
Did I hear - politically difficult or impossible ... ?

Stuart

On Thursday, 16 October 2014 15:51:36 UTC+1, andrewjlockley wrote:

http://news.sciencemag.org/chemistry/2014/10/storing-greenhouse-gas-underground-million-years

MARC HESSE

Storing greenhouse gas underground—for a million years

When Canada switched on its Boundary Dam power plant earlier this month, it 
signaled a new front in the war against climate change. The commercial turbine 
burns coal, the dirtiest of fossil fuels, but it traps nearly all the resulting 
carbon dioxide underground before it reaches the atmosphere. Part of this 
greenhouse gas is pumped into porous, water-bearing underground rock layers. 
Now, a new study provides the first field evidence that CO2 can be stored 
safely for a million years in these saline aquifers, assuaging worries that the 
gas might escape back into the atmosphere.“

It's a very comprehensive piece of work,” says geochemist Stuart Gilfillan of 
the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom, who was not involved in the 
study. “The approach is very novel.”

There have been several attempts to capture the carbon dioxide released by the 
world’s 7000-plus coal-fired plants. Pilot projects in Algeria, Japan, and 
Norway indicate that CO2can be stored in underground geologic formations such 
as depleted oil and gas reservoirs, deep coal seams, and saline aquifers. In 
the United States, saline aquifers are believed to have the largest capacity 
for CO2 storage, with potential sites spread out across the country, and 
several in western states such as Colorado also host large coal power plants. 
CO2 pumped into these formations are sealed under impermeable cap rocks, where 
it gradually dissolves into the salty water and mineralizes. Some researchers 
suggest the aquifers have enough capacity to store a century’s worth of 
emissions from America’s coal-fired plants, but others worry the gas can leak 
back into the air through fractures too small to detect.

To resolve the dilemma, geoscientists need to know how long it takes for the 
trapped CO2 to dissolve. The faster the CO2 dissolves and mineralizes, the less 
risk that it would leak back into the atmosphere. But determining the rate of 
dissolution is no easy feat. Lab simulations suggest that the sealed gas could 
completely dissolve over 10,000 years, a process too slow to be tested 
empirically.

So computational geoscientist Marc Hesse of the University of Texas, Austin, 
and colleagues turned to a natural lab: the Bravo Dome gas field in New Mexico, 
one of the world's largest natural CO2 reservoirs. Ancient volcanic activities 
there have pumped the gas into a saline aquifer 700 meters underground. Since 
the 1980s, oil companies have drilled hundreds of wells there to extract the 
gas for enhanced oil recovery, leaving a wealth of data on the site’s geology 
and CO2storage.

To find out how fast CO2 dissolves in the aquifers, the researchers needed to 
know two things: the total amount of gas dissolved at the reservoir and how 
long it has been there. Because the gas is volcanic in origin, the researchers 
reasoned that it must have arrived at Bravo Dome steaming hot—enough to warm up 
the surrounding rocks. So they examined the buildup of radiogenic elements in 
the mineral apatite. These elements accumulate at low temperatures, but are 
released if the mineral is heated above 75°C, allowing the researchers to 
determine when the mineral was last heated above such a high temperature. The 
team estimated that the CO2 was pumped into the reservoir about 1.2 million 
years ago.Then the scientists calculated the amount of gas dissolved over the 
millennia, using the helium-3 isotope as a tracer. Like CO2, helium-3 is 
released during volcanic eruptions, and it is rather insoluble in saline water. 
By studying how the ratio of helium-3 to CO2 changes across the reservoir, the 
researchers found that out of the 1.6 gigatons of gas trapped underground at 
the reservoir,only a fifth has dissolved over 1.2 million years. That’s the 
equivalent of 75 years of emissions from a single 500-megawatt coal power 
plant, they report online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy 
of Sciences.

More intriguingly, the analysis also provided the first field evidence of how 
CO2 dissolves after it is pumped into the aquifers. In theory, the CO2 
dissolves through diffusion, which takes place when the gas comes into contact 
with the water surface. But the process could move faster if convection—in 
which water saturated with CO2 sinks and fresh water flows into its place to 
absorb more gas—were also at work. Analysis revealed that at Bravo Dome, 10% of 
the total gas at the reservoir dissolved after the initial emplacement. 
Diffusion alone cannot account for that amount, the researchers argue, as the 
gas accumulating at the top of the reservoir would have quickly saturated still 
water. Instead, convection most likely occurred.Hesse says constraints on 
convection might explain why CO2 dissolves much more slowly in saline aquifers 
at Bravo Dome than previously estimated, at a rate of 0.1 gram per square meter 
per year. The culprit would be the relatively impermeable Brava Dome rocks, 
which limit water flow and thus the rate of convective CO2 dissolution. At 
storage sites with more porous rocks, the gas could dissolve much faster and 
mineralize earlier, he says.Even so, the fact that CO2 stayed locked up 
underground for so long at Bravo Dome despite ongoing industrial drilling 
should allay concerns about potential leakage, Hesse says. Carbon capture and 
storage “can work, if you do it in the right place,” he says. “[This is] an 
enormous amount of CO2 that has sat there, for all we can tell, very peacefully 
for more than a million years.”

Posted in Chemistry, Earth

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to