Me too—mine relating more to the policy aspects to complement the one you
and Ben Kravitz put in.

Best, Mike


On 12/18/14 9:26 AM, "Alan Robock" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have proposed a geoengineering session for the Paris meeting, but have not
> heard back yet if it is approved.
> 
> Alan Robock 🌋
> 
> Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor
>    Editor, Reviews of Geophysics
>    Director, Meteorology Undergraduate Program
> Department of Environmental Sciences                      Phone:
> +1-848-932-5751
> Rutgers University
> Fax: +1-732-932-8644
> 14 College Farm Road                                E-mail:
> [email protected]
> New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551  USA           http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock
>                  
> http://twitter.com/AlanRobock
> Watch my 18 min TEDx talk at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsrEk1oZ-54
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Dec 18, 2014, at 3:31 AM, olivermorton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I quite agree with Mike -- it's really unfortunate to line this up against
>> the Paris conference. That said, I don't know for sure that there will be
>> geongeineering threads in Pars -- but there were in teh analagous Copenhagen
>> conference six months before COP15, and this conference seems to be about
>> setting an agenda for COP21 in a similar way.
>> 
>> I don't suppose there is any way at this stage to move the Berlin meeting?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thursday, 18 December 2014 03:22:13 UTC, Mike MacCracken  wrote:
>>> This conference unfortunately directly conflicts with a major conference in
>>> Paris—see http://www.commonfuture-paris2015.org/--that will hopefully also
>>> have geoengineering sessions considering the larger questions about it. It
>>> also follows by just one week the IUGG conference in Prague that has a
>>> couple of geoengineering sessions. It would sure be nice if there were a bit
>>> better checking for conflicts, etc.
>>> 
>>> Best, Mike MacCracken
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 12/17/14 9:28 AM, "Andrew Lockley" <[email protected]
>>> <http://[email protected]> > wrote:
>>> 
>>>> http://www.spp-climate-engineering.de/the-symposium.html
>>>> 
>>>> Current State and Future Perspectives
>>>> 
>>>> Several European projects in the area of climate engineering research will
>>>> have been completed in 2015. In Germany, the DFG’s Scientific Priority
>>>> Program on Climate Engineering (SPP1689) will enter preparation for its
>>>> second phase. Other countries are debating the merits of commencing their
>>>> own research projects on climate engineering. Against this background, the
>>>> Symposium „Climate Engineering Research: Current State and Future
>>>> Perspectives“ in Berlin, July 7-10, 2015 has two aims in mind:
>>>> To take stock on what we collectively know about climate engineering.
>>>> To exchange views on the different directions in which research could and
>>>> should move in order to provide sufficient information for societal
>>>> decisions on Climate Engineering.
>>>> 
>>>> See link for deadlines
>> 
>> This e-mail may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended
>> recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies. It may also
>> contain personal views which are not the views of The Economist Group. We may
>> monitor e-mail to and from our network.
>> 
>> Sent by a member of The Economist Group. The Group's parent company is The
>> Economist Newspaper Limited, registered in England with company number 236383
>> and registered office at 25 St James's Street, London, SW1A 1HG. For Group
>> company registration details go to http://legal.economistgroup.com
>> <http://legal.economistgroup.com>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to