Thank you for this word of caution. Of course I have seen this often, that fine 
dust in a gas-laden fluid leads to nucleation of gas bubbles (you can 
demonstrate it with your next beer). The advantage is that you can do it under 
controlled conditions, and warn the surrounding people, so you can avert a lake 
Nyos experience, and of course the best caution is to start slowly and observe 
any potential effects, Olaf Schuiling

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Andrew Lockley
Sent: zaterdag 3 januari 2015 19:44
To: [email protected]; geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] FW: emitting or capturing CO2


It's not super saturated. It's under pressure. There's plenty of nucleation 
points already as it's dirty Lake water.

A
On 3 Jan 2015 18:41, "Christoph Voelker" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear all,

I have no real expertise on that, but I'd like to add a word of caution: Have 
you ever added some fine-grained powder to a liquid oversaturated with a gas? 
You get a lot of bubbles quickly. The result could well be that the grains 
trigger a spontaneous ebullition of the CO2 before it has time to react with 
the olivine. That would be catastrophic, so even if the chance is very low I'd 
rather be cautious.

Best regards, Christoph

On 1/3/15 2:22 PM, Schuiling, R.D. (Olaf) wrote:
Dear All,
Andrew suggested that I should share this discussion  with the group on whether 
to emit the CO2 from that acid lake in Spain to the atmosphere, or capture it 
as  bicarbonate by adding fine-grained olivine to the lake, while at the same 
time reduce its acidity, Olaf Schuiling

From: Schuiling, R.D. (Olaf)
Sent: vrijdag 2 januari 2015 12:23
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: emitting or capturing CO2

Dear Andrew
Just a few additional data on olivine use instead of degassing. I have no money 
to carry out full-scale field experiments, so I am limited to the following.

1.       There is an olivine mine (the PASEK mine) in NW Spain, close to the 
sea, with a harbor for small (up to 8.000 tons) freighters. They have no 
clients for their finest fraction, which would be excellent for the acid lake, 
so they have to store it back in their own mine (slight negative value!)

2.       The acid lake is not easy to reach, but the river Guadalquivir 
(navigable to Sevilla) makes it possible to bring that olivine cheaply by ship 
not too far from the acid lake.

3.       I have done experiments with a well-known table water (Spa red), 
bottled under CO2 pressure. Its starting pH was 3.9. After passing through a 
tube filled with medium sized olivine grains (a passage that took somewhere 
between 15 and 30 minutes), the pH had risen to 8.2!

4.       When the lake is neutralized this way, the reaction will also release 
some silica in solution. This will attract siliceous algae (diatoms), a 
favorite fish food, so the lake may become a favorite spot for fishing after 
treatment, and it will also have become suitable for irrigation in dry summers.

5.       I attach a paper describing the  experiment of converting a CO2 rich 
table water into a healthy magnesium bicarbonate mineral water. (Schuiling, 
R.D., Hogesteger, A.W. and Praagman, E.(2011) From Spa to Corinth, a road to 
CO2 sequestration)


I think we should use any way to reduce CO2 emissions, so capturing CO2 instead 
of freely emitting it should normally be preferred, Olaf Schuiling

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




--

Christoph Voelker

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research

Am Handelshafen 12

27570 Bremerhaven, Germany

e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

t: +49 471 4831 1848<tel:%2B49%20471%204831%201848>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to